One of the concepts I need in my paper is best summarized on the n-Lab page. I tried my best to find a similar description of the same concept in a more "classical" reference, such as a paper or a book, but I can't.
I have two questions:
(a) Is it "allowed" to cite n-Lab in a research paper? I mean, are people doing this? Would it make a referee frown?
(b) What is the format of citing a page from n-Lab?
Best Answer
From https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/FAQ#Citing:
Here's one possible BibTeX template, which is similar to what I've used in published papers:
@Misc{nlab:pagename, author = {{nLab authors}}, title = {Page Name}, howpublished = {\url{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/page+name}}, note = {\href{http://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/page+name/N}{revision N}}, month = {Month}, year = XXXX}
The double-brackets around
{{nLab authors}}
cause thealpha
citation style (which I prefer to the numbered one) to cite it as[nLaXX]
, which is not great but better than[autXX]
if you put in only single brackets. (Suggestions for improvements here are welcome.) In some cases, if the page as it existed at the time of citation was largely the work of one person (perhaps with minor things like typo fixes from other contributors --- this requires looking through the page history version-by-version to find out), I have instead attributed it to that person "and others" in the BibTeX (producing "et. al." in the citation --- this is one situation in mathematics where I feel "et. al." is actually warranted).Edit: All nLab pages now have a "Cite" link at the bottom that produces BibTeX according to my template!