Let $X$ be a smooth projective algebraic surface (over $\mathbb{C}$ ). For all $L\in \mathrm{Pic}(X)$, we have
$$\chi(L)=\chi(\mathcal{O}_X)+\frac{1}{2}(L^2-L\cdot \omega_X).$$
This is the famous Riemann-Roch theorem in the flavour I like the most. It usually comes together with the following two formulas:
$$\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)=\frac{1}{12}(K_X^2+\chi_{top}(X)),$$
the Noether's formula and
$$2p_a(C)-2=C^2+C\cdot K_X,$$
the genus formula for $C$ an irreducible (possibly singular) curve.
Is there a similar (or maybe the same) version for
a) Smooth quasi-projective surfaces.
b) Projective surface with quotient singularities, or A-D-E singularities.
Best Answer
If $X$ is proper with rational singularities (and quotient and A-D-E (=Du Val) singularities are rational), then you can do most cohomology computations on a resolution.
Let $\pi:Y\to X$ be a resolution of singularities (not necessarily minimal). Then if $X$ has rational singularities, then $R^i\pi_*\mathscr O_Y=0$ for $i>0$. Let $L$ be a line bundle on $X$. Then by the above vanishing, $h^i(Y,\pi^*L)=h^i(X,L)$, so we have that $$\chi(Y,\pi^*L)=\chi(X,L).$$ Note that this actually holds in any dimension.
It follows that one has a sort-of-RR on $X$ (surface): $$\chi(X,L)=\chi(\mathcal{O}_X)+\frac{1}{2}((\pi^*c_1(L))^2-(\pi^*c_1(L))\cdot K_Y).$$ (Remark: it is not a bad idea to distinguish when we talk about a line bundle and when we talk about the associated Cartier divisor! Besides having the formulas be well-defined one has to remember that for example the push forward of a divisor via a birational map is also a divisor, while the push forward of a line bundle is not necessarily a line bundle. And even if it is, the divisor associated to the push forward of a line bundle is not necessarily the same as the push forward of the divisor associated to the line bundle.)
As for your question about the quasi-projective case, Christian already said that it is tricky. In general, when it comes to cohomology, experience shows that it is better to compactify and figure out the difference than trying to develop a handicapped theory for quasi-projective varieties directly. (See Deligne's way of doing Hodge theory on open varieties).
The genus formula on a surface is essentially equivalent to Riemann-Roch, so as soon as the formula makes sense, it will follow.