Unless the arXiv has changed recently, articles are published daily which means that the feeds and the email are completely in step.
The problem with the duplicates is that each feed is a separate request to the arXiv for information. The arXiv doesn't know that you are going to merge these results, and I've never heard of a feed reader that attempts to merge feeds to remove duplicates.
However, all is not lost. The feeds that the arXiv provides are not the only way to find information. The arXiv has an API which means that you can effectively craft your own feed. For example, if you point your browser at:
http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=submittedDate:[20091014200000+TO+20091015200000]&start=0&max_results=500
then you get all the papers submitted yesterday. You can filter your search by subject.
http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=%28cat:math.AT+OR+cat:math.CT%29+AND+submittedDate:[20091014200000+TO+20091015200000]&start=0&max_results=500
Because the requests are handled all at once, there are no duplicates produced (as can be seen since Emily Riehl's paper is both math.AT and math.CT).
The only catch is that you need to put the date in proper form each time, you can't put in dates such as "today" or "yesterday". Plus the timezone handling is a little weird: the arxiv publishes updates at a certain time determined by the local timezone, which includes daylight saving changes, but the API uses GMT/UTC. So if you want to exactly replicated the "new preprints" announcement of the arxiv then you need to do some funky timezone conversions.
However, this can be done and I've done it. I use a program called RefBase for organising my references and I've modified it so that each morning it presents me with a list of what's new on the arxiv for me to scan through and decide which articles to add to my own bibliographic database. I can also scan back a few days if I've been on holiday. Buried in this extension is the code for figuring out what the date-stamp should be. I could extract it if there's any interest.
Documentation on the arxiv API is at their documentation site. The 'submittedDate' stuff isn't covered there though, that's a newer feature.
In any case I think you should update the arXiv paper, that's where most people will read your paper anyways. Besides, writing a separate errata paper seems a bit unnecessary in this case. In the arXiv version you could probably add a footnote about the change of numbering.
On the other hand, when people reference a result our article, it would be convenient if the numbering is the same in both versions. Would it be possible to change the theorem numbering in the arXiv paper so that it resembles the submitted version?
Best Answer
I asked the arxiv administrators about this last year, and received the following reply.
Dear Scott,
Thank you for your feedback. At this time we have no plans to change the way the submission ID and the final arXiv ID are created. We developed the new submission system to be more flexible for our users who need an area to work on their submission and conduct any updates for formatting/layout/typos without being constrained on time. Hence, we can not issue an arXiv ID until the submission has been announced.
We are looking into ways to make a submission available to all the co-authors but can not provide a time frame when this feature will be added. We have received feedback that validates the need to be able to share a submission before it is announced and we are working on a solution.
-- arXiv admin
On 07/07/2010 11:38 AM, Scott Morrison wrote: