Why is finite rank necessary here? – Dummit & Foote 10.3.13

abstract-algebrafree-modulesmodules

Problem statement: "Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $F$ be a free $R$-module of finite rank. Prove the following isomorphism of $R$-modules: Hom$_R(F,R) \simeq F.$"

My proof relies on the fact that for any element $\phi \in \text{Hom}_R(F,R)$ we can map it to $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \phi(a_i)a_i$ for $\{a_1,\ a_2,\ \dots,\ a_n\}$ a basis for $F$. But shouldn't you also be able to use infinite sums here instead, if the basis were infinite? Or does something break in the infinite case?

(And for any given element of $F$, all but finitely many basis elements should have a coefficient of 0 according to the definition of free modules in the text, but that shouldn't be an issue.)

Best Answer

No, with the given hypotheses you cannot use infinite sums here. No object in this construction has a topology so there's no way to define convergence of such a sum. And in fact the statement is false in the infinite rank case: for example if $R = \mathbb{Q}$ and $F = \bigoplus_{\mathbb{N}} \mathbb{Q}$ is a countable-dimensional $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space, then $\text{Hom}_R(F, R) \cong \mathbb{Q}^{\mathbb{N}}$ is uncountable-dimensional.

Related Question