Why does there’s need of axiom that vector spaces must be closed under scalar multiplication

linear algebra

I am learning linear algebra and I just learnt about vector spaces. There're axioms that vector spaces must be closed under addition , vector spaces must be closed under scalar multiplication.

So I am thinking that if the vector space is closed under addition the it must also be closed under scalar multiplication.

Reason:

Suppose set $ \mathbf{X} $ is closed under addition.

if $ \mathbf{v} \in \mathbf{X} $ then $ k\mathbf{v} \in \mathbf{X}$

$ \because k\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_{1} + \mathbf{v}_{2} + \mathbf{v}_{3} + … + \mathbf{v}_{k}$

while i am writing this question i thought if $ k \in \mathbb{Q} $
then $ k = \frac{m}{n} $

then $\frac{m}{n}\mathbf{v} = \frac{(\mathbf{v}_{1} + \mathbf{v}_{2} + … + \mathbf{v}_{m})}{n} $

= $ (\mathbf{v}_{1} + \mathbf{v}_{2} + … + \mathbf{v}_{m}) – (n\mathbf{u}_{1} + n\mathbf{u}_{2} + … + n\mathbf{u}_{v})$ where $ \mathbf{u} \in \mathbf{X} $

if $ \mathbf{X} $ is $ \mathbb{R}^{n} $ then $\mathbb{u}$ will be vector of one's $ \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 … 1_{n} \end{bmatrix} $

But if $ \mathbf{X} $ is not $ \mathbb{R}^{n} $ then it doesn't need to have such vector. Right?

basically, i am trying to think multiplication as addition and division as subtraction and subtraction is a kind of addition. That's why i am not getting the need of axiom vector spaces must be closed under scalar multiplication.

What am i doing wrong here ? Am i missing something ?

Many Many thanks đŸ™‚

Best Answer

Your reasoning is correct to some extent: addition can mimick multiplication by an integer. I am not getting why you can mimick rational numbers: this is false. For example, take the points in the plane that have just integer coordinates: this is closed for addition, but not for multiplication by rational numbers.

In general, vector spaces are closed by multiplication for "numbers" in a field, where the most used field is the one of real numbers. This is probably the only field your textbook introduce; maybe it will also introduce the one of complex numbers.

The fundamental idea is that a field contains a lot of things more than the integers, and in general a lot more. Technically, your argument does not workby the following counterexample: just take $\mathbb{Z}$. This is closed by addition but not for scalar multiplication!!

Related Question