Why does the fourier transform invert scales

Question

I am learning about the Fourier transform and have looked at some popular functions and their transforms and have noticed and wondered why the scale is inverted.

I also have seen this as a general property of the Fourier transform from time/spatial domain to frequency domain.
I.e. $f(ax)$ in spatial domain is $\frac{1}{|a|} F({\omega}{a})$

or how the impulse function with spacing T is also just an impulse but with spacing 1/T.
Or the gaussian with its variance inverted, etc.

Would someone have an intuitive answer as to why?

Thank you so much!

Answer 1

I think of it as follows:

• Have the fundamental result in mind (from the theory fo distributions): the Fourier transform of a Dirac "pulse" is $1$. From an engineering point of view, a "Dirac" pulse, which has an infinitely small time support, equally excites all the frequencies. That is the reason why when you want to study the response of a mechanical system (to study vibrations or acoustic for instance) you use a hammer or a shot noise that mimics the Dirac pulse to excite all frequencies.

Now concerning your formula : $$ \mathcal{F}\left(t\mapsto f(at)\right)=\frac{1}{\mid a \mid}\hat{f}\left(\frac{\xi}{a} \right) $$

• When $a$ becomes bigger and bigger you are more and more localized in the time domain due to the factor $at$. The signal time support is shortened and you get "closer" to the Dirac pulse. By consequence, you spread more and more in the frequency domain (the $\frac{\xi}{a}$ factor), to get closer to $1$. Now you also have to take into account energy conservation (the Parseval's theorem). In the time domain, like you reduce the time support without changing the amplitude of the signal, its energy is diminished (energy is roughly $support \times amplitude^2$). In the frequency domain, on the contrary, the support increases. By consequence to conserve energy you must add the $\frac{1}{\mid a\mid}$ factor that diminishes amplitude of the response in the frequency domain.