Let $V$ be a vector space and $k\in \mathbb{N}$. Denote $\Lambda^k V$ the exterior $k
$-power of $V$.
Let $f:\Lambda^k V^*\to (\Lambda^k V)^*$ be the map such that a $k$-covector $\eta_1\wedge \cdots \wedge \eta_k$ is sent to the $k$-alternating form (identified as a dual element of $\Lambda^k V$) $(v_1,\cdots,v_k)\mapsto \sum_{\sigma} \epsilon(\sigma) \eta_1(v_{\sigma(1)}) \cdots \eta_k(v_{\sigma(k)})$. (It seems that there is another convention, with a factor $\frac{1}{k!}$ in that formula.)
There are (see here) two ways to define natural products between $k$-alternating forms. Let us denote $\wedge_1$ the product based on the formula with the $Alt$ operator (in the previous link), and $\wedge_2$ the product based on the formula with a sum over shuffle permutations (in the previous link).
Question : What is true and what is false in the following statements ? Let $\omega \in \Lambda^k V^*$ and $\omega'\in \Lambda^{k'} V^*$.
1) $f(\omega\wedge \omega') = f(\omega)\wedge_1 f(\omega')$
1') Same as 1) but with the $1/k!$ factor in the definition of $f$.
2) $f(\omega\wedge \omega')=f(\omega) \wedge_2 f(\omega')$
2') Same as 2) but with the $1/k!$ factor in the definition of $f$.
Best Answer
Let's be more precise about all the conventions involved. There are two common conventions for the duality between $\Lambda(V^{*})$ and $\Lambda(V)^{*}$:
There are also two common conventions for the product of two alternating multilinear forms $\omega \in \Lambda^k(V)^{*}, \mu \in \Lambda^l(V)^{*}$:
Clearly we have $\omega \wedge_1 \mu = \frac{(k+l)!}{k! l!} \omega \wedge_2 \mu$. Now, given $\eta \in \Lambda^k(V^{*}), \eta' \in \Lambda^l(V^{*})$, we have:
From here you see that conventions $f_1$ and $\wedge_1$ should be used together to get an algebra isomorphism between $\Lambda(V^{*})$ and $\Lambda(V)^{*}$. Those conventions work over any any field or ring (the defining formulas don't involve any division) and have various other advantages. Alternatively, you can use $f_2$ and $\wedge_2$ together which have the advantage of making the projection $\operatorname{Alt} \colon \operatorname{Mult}^{*}(V) \rightarrow \operatorname{Alt}^{*}(V)$ into an algebra homomorphism. I've never seen someone using $f_1$ and $\wedge_2$ or $f_2$ and $\wedge_1$.