Spectrum of operator $T: \ell^{2}\supset\text{dom}(T) \rightarrow \ell^{2}$ defined by $(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto (nx_{n})_{n\in \mathbb {N}}$

functional-analysisspectral-theory

What is the point, continuous and residual spectrum of the following operator?

$T: \ell^{2}\supset\text{dom}(T) \rightarrow \ell^{2}$, $(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto (nx_{n})_{n\in \mathbb {N}}$, where $\text{dom}(T) = \left\{(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \in \ell^{2} |
(nx_{n})_{n\in \mathbb {N}} \in \ell^{2} \right\}$

My thoughts so far: Since $T$ is self-adjoint it must be that $\sigma_{r}(T) = \emptyset$. Now considering the point spectrum, I tried to find the eigenvalues of $T$: $Tx = \lambda x \iff (n-\lambda) x_{n} = 0$. But then I would have $x_{n}=1 $ for $n = \lambda$ and $x_{n}=0$ otherwise, so the corresponding eigenvectors are not in $\text{dom}(T)$, right? So $\sigma_{p}(T) = \emptyset$? Can anyone provide hints for $\sigma_r(T)$ or $\sigma_c(T)$, please?

Best Answer

You are correct that $T$ is self-adjoint and thus $\sigma_r(T) = \emptyset$ (and also $\sigma(T) \subset \mathbb R$). Your reasoning for $\sigma_p(T) = \emptyset$ is only partially correct (as the other answer indicates) because it only works if $\lambda \in \mathbb N$ (otherwise $n = \lambda$ doesn't work!). But the sequence $$ x_n = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{for } n = \lambda, \\ 0, & \text{else.} \end{cases} $$ is in $\text{dom}(T)$, as $$ n x_n = \begin{cases} \lambda, & \text{for } n = \lambda, \\ 0, & \text{else.} \end{cases} $$ and thus $$ \| (n x_n)_{n \in \mathbb N} \|_{\ell^2} = \sqrt{\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (n x_n)^2} = \lambda < \infty. $$ This shows that $\mathbb N \subset \sigma_p(T)$ and equality if you argue that for $\lambda \not\in \mathbb N$ there is no solution to $(n - \lambda) x_n = 0$ for all $n \in \mathbb N$ and the solution above is the only one for $\lambda \in \mathbb N$.

We have $$ \sigma_c(T) := \{ \lambda \in \mathbb R: T - \lambda \text{ injective}, \text{ ran}(T - \lambda) \subsetneq \ell^2 \text{ dense} \}. $$ Inorder for $T - \lambda$ to be injective, $(T - \lambda) x = ((n - \lambda) x_n)_{n \in \mathbb N} = 0$ has to imply $x = 0$. We have seen above that this is true for all $\lambda \in \mathbb R \setminus \mathbb N$.