My first question/confusion is regarding the definition of reduced suspension $\sum X$ and suspension $SX$ of a space $X$.
Usually, we denote the quotient space of $X$ with subspace $A$ identified to a point as $X/A$. I understand that suspension of a space is like a 'double-cone': we take a space $X$ and consider its cone $CX=X\times I/X\times \{0\}$, then define $SX:=CX/X\times \{1\}$. Therefore, $\sum X:=SX/\{x_0\}\times I$. I understand that it is not correct to say that $\sum X=\frac{X\times I}{(X\times \{1\})\cup (X\times \{0\})\cup (\{x_0\}\times I)}$ because this would mean that the whole set $(X\times \{1\})\cup (X\times \{0\})\cup (x_0\times I)$ is identified to a point. Is my understanding correct? Thanks.
Now comes my second question/confusion:
This pertains to Example 0.10 of Hatcher's. I am trying to understand and prove the following statement:
'The reduced suspension $ΣX$ is actually the same as the smash product $X ∧ S^1$ since both spaces are the quotient of $X×I$ with $X×∂I ∪\{x_0\}×I$ collapsed to a point.'
How to prove this?
$X∧ S^1:=\frac{X\times S^1}{X\times \{0\}\cup \{x_0\}\times S^1}$
I think I should now use $I/\partial I=S^1$ somehow but I don't understand how to go from here to prove the statement.
Best Answer