Proving $\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{2}$ is closed, not open and not bounded metric spaces

analysismetric-spacesreal-analysis

I'm working my way through the examples in Rudin on open sets, closed sets and other related material to get use to working with the definitions.

I'm trying to show that $\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{2}$ is closed, but not open and not bounded. My attempts are below.

Closed:

We want to show that $\mathbb{Z} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{2}$ contains all of its limit points. Suppose that $p =(p_{1}, p_{2})$ is a limit point of $\mathbb{Z}$ and that $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$ (say). Then $B_{\epsilon}(p) = \{(a,b): d((a,b), (p_{1},p_{2})) < \epsilon\}.$

For our given choice of $\epsilon, B_{\epsilon}(p) = p.$ Which contradicts the fact that $p$ is a limit point and therefore $\mathbb{Z}$ doesn't have any limit points. Hence it is closed (it contains all of its limit points, because it doesn't have any!).

NOT open:

Consider the point $(0,0)$, and let $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}.$ Then $B_{\epsilon}((0,0))$ doesn't contain any other points of $\mathbb{Z}$ other than the point $(0,0)$ itself. Hence it is not open.

Question: What should the distance function actually be for $B_{\epsilon}((0,0))$? I am presuming it is the Euclidean metric in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ i.e. we would be showing $\sqrt{(a-0)^{2} + (b-0)^{2}} < \epsilon$ for some $(a,b) \in \mathbb{Z}.$

NOT bounded:

If we have a metric space $(X,d)$ and $E \subseteq X$, Rudin defines a bounded set as follows

$E$ is bounded if there is a real number $M$ and a point $q \in X$ such that $d(p,q) < M$ for all $p$ in $E$.

Am I correct that NOT bounded is therefore defined as follows:

$E$ is not bounded is for all real numbers $M$ and all points $q \in X$, $d(p,q) \geq M$ for some $p$ in $E$

(I wasn't sure if its only the quantifiers that I swap)

I'm not too sure how to proceed. I was thinking I could maybe use the Archemedian property in someway, but because I'm in a subset of $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ I'm not sure if that approach will work. Similarly I can't use $\sup$ or $\inf$ as I'm in a subset of $\mathbb{R}^{2}$.

Thanks.

Best Answer

I will assume that we are using a sensible embedding of $\mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ (say by $n \mapsto (n, 0)$).

To your question about the metric. From context I would presume that the metric is the usual euclidean one (the claim is false if we take an arbitrary metric - consider the discrete metric which makes all subsets open!).

Your proofs of closedness and non-openness seem fine.

You are right to think the set is not bounded. What you want to show is

Given any $M > 0$ and any $p \in \mathbb{R}^2$, there is some $a \in \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ such that $d(p, a) > M$.

To do this, suppose that $p = (x, y)$. Then $d(p, (n,0)) \geq |n - x|$, so if we choose some large $n$ so that $|n - x| > M$ we are done.