The game:
I am going to toss a fair coin and you are trying to determine if I tossed a Head or Tail.
You do this using the rule I follow when I toss my coin:
I have before me $2$ $\color{red}{\text{red}}$ boxes each with a $\color{red}{\text{red}}$ marble inside them, I also have $2$ $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ boxes each with a $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ marble inside of them. Finally, there are two empty white boxes.
If I toss a Head I must move a $\color{red}{\text{red}}$ marble from a $\color{red}{\text{red}}$ box into an empty white box. Similarly, if I toss a Tail I must move a $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ marble from a $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ box into an empty white box.
To aid you in your guess of my toss, once I have moved a marble, you are then permitted to open and examine the contents of a single $\color{red}{\text{red}}$, $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ or white box.
The strategy:
In this primitive instance of two boxes of each color, we are actually indifferent between what box we peek into. We have 75% probability of correctly guessing the toss.
Consider now we have $R$, $\color{red}{\text{red}}$ boxes, $B$ $\color{blue}{\text{blue}}$ boxes and $W$ white boxes. The optimal strategy is to peak into min{ $R,B,W$ }.
I was curious as to why we have symmetry between the colored and white boxes and simply follow the heuristic of the minimum number of boxes, is there a nice transformation of the game that makes this symmetry more obvious? Thanks
Best Answer
Here’s a transformation that clearly doesn’t change the game, but makes the analysis simpler: have the first player privately distinguish three boxes, one of each color, in advance before flipping the coin. They then proceed as before, but must move the marble from the distinguished red or blue box to the distinguished white box.
We now reason as follows.
Therefore, the second player should maximize their chance of examining a distinguished box, which means they should examine a box with the fewest number of boxes of the same color.