It is easy to construct a holomorphic surjection $\mathbb D^* \to \mathbb D$ (cf. below). Let's show that there is a conformal surjection $f : \mathbb D^* \to \mathbb D$.
Step 1. Such a $f$ exists if and only if you can find a surjective, noninjective conformal map $\varphi : \mathbb D \to \mathbb D$.
Proof of the “if” part (the one relevant for your question): take such a $\varphi$ and two elements $z_1$, $z_2$ of $\mathbb D$ such that $\varphi(z_1) = \varphi(z_2)$. Then $\varphi_{|\mathbb D \setminus \{z_1\}}$ is a surjective, noninjective conformal map $\mathbb D \setminus \{z_1\} \to \mathbb D$. Composing with a disc automorphism, you can assume $z_1 = 0$.
Proof of the “only if” part: the exponential map gives a surjective conformal map $\{z \in \mathbb C \, | \,\Re z \leq 0\} \to \mathbb D^*$. Composing with a biholomorphism between this half-plane and the unit disk, you get a conformal surjective, noninjective map $\pi : \mathbb D^* \to \mathbb D$ (the universal covering map). If a $f$ exists, $\varphi = f \circ \pi$ is a surjective noninjective conformal map from the disc to itself.
Step 2. Construction of such a $\varphi$.
By the Riemann mapping theorem, it is enough to construct a surjective, noninjective conformal map from a simply connected, $\neq \mathbb C$ domain to another simply connect, $\neq \mathbb C$ domain.
It is very easy to convince oneself that plenty of such functions exist (e.g. by restricting to a suitable domain a cubic polynomial whose roots are simple) but finding an explicit example that provably works is harder. (A good computer picture might help). I'm too lazy to do it.
Instead of that, let's use a neat trick: let's forget a moment the rigid conformal world and let $F : U \to V$ a surjective, noninjective local diffeomorphism between two simply connected, $\neq \mathbb C$ open subsets of $\mathbb C$. (This time, the world is flexible: a mere picture can prove that such a $F$ exists. I'll give an example at the end of this answer.)
$V$ being a subset of $\mathbb C$, it inherits from it a conformal structure. Because of the Riemann mapping theorem, it's conformally equivalent to a disc. Now, one can pull back this conformal structure along $F$ to get a conformal structure on $U$ for which $F$ is tautologically a conformal map. (Beware! this structure is a priori not the one inherited from the conformal structure of $\mathbb C$!) The only question is: is $U$ with this mysterious conformal structure conformally equivalent to the disc? The answer is yes, of course: the uniformisation theorem guarantees that any simply connected surface is equivalent to the Riemann sphere, the complex plane or the unit disc; $U$ isn't even homeomorphic to the Riemann sphere so it certainly cannot be conformally equivalent to it, and it has a nonconstant conformal map to the disc so, by Liouville's theorem, it cannot be conformally equivalent to the complex plane. We (finally!) have a surjective, noninjective conformal map between two conformal discs!
An example of $F$
This example is probably not the clearest nor the simplest, but the idea seems good to me: make a band to spiral around two poles so that the arms of the spiral (i) auto-intersect the core of the spiral [which a priori creates two holes] and (ii) go on to fill the hole created by the opposite arm.
I'm sure that this idea can be used to create better pictures of a surjective, noninjective local diffeomorphism between two nontrivial simply connected domains in the plane and even to cook up a nice (e.g. polynomial) formula implementing this behaviour. But I'm unable to do either.
Off-topic appendix.
And finally, here's a simple example of a surjective holomorphic map $\mathbb D^* \to \mathbb D$ which has one critical point (from my first answer where I had misread the question).
Step 1: $z \mapsto z^2$ is a conformal surjection $\mathbb D \to \mathbb D$. Of course, it does not remain surjective if you delete $0$ in the first disc, but it remains so if you delete any other point in it, say $1/2$ (because $-1/2$ has the same image).
Step 2: Compose with a disk automorphism which sends $0$ to $1/2$.
So $$f : \begin{array}{ccc} \mathbb D^* & \to & \mathbb D \\ z & \mapsto & \left( \frac{x+1/2}{1+x/2} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{2x+1}{x+2} \right)^2\end{array}$$ does the trick.
With the requirement that $r>0$, then for example $\mathbb D^*$ is indeed not conformal to an annulus. Note however than $\mathbb D^*=A(0,1)$. On the other hand, $\mathbb C^*$ is also a doubly connected region, that is not conformal to $\mathbb D^*$ (if it were, it would extend to a conformal map between $\mathbb D$ and $\mathbb C$).
The complete and correct statement is that if $U$ is a doubly connected open subset of $\mathbb C$ such that $\mathbb C \backslash U$ contains at least two points, then there is a unique $r \in [0,1)$ such that $U$ is conformal to $A(r,1)$.
If $r>0$, then the number $\frac{1}{2\pi} \ln r^{-1}$ is called the modulus of $U$; otherwise $U$ is often called an annulus of infinite modulus. In that case, $U$ is biholomorphic to a simply connected domain with one point removed.
Best Answer
Note that if $g:\mathbb D^* \to \mathbb C$ is holomorphic and both bounded inferior and superior ($0<m<|g(z)|<M$), then $g$ extends holomorphically to a nonvanishing function on the unit disc, so has a holomorphic square root $h^2=g$
Now if $f :\mathbb D^* \to A$ is a holomorphic isomorphism where $A$ is the annulus $1<|z|<2$ (though any proper annulus will do), then if $I:A \to A$ is the identity function, $I\circ f$ is holomorphic and both bounded inferior and superior on the punctured disc, so has a square root $h^2=I\circ f$ which implies that $I(z)=h^2(f^{-1}(z))=(h(f^{-1}(z)))^2$ so getting the required contradiction as we know that $I$ doesn't have a square root ($k^2=I$ implies $2k'/k=I'/I$ and integrating $0=\frac{1}{2\pi i}(2k'/k-I'/I)$ on the circle of radius $3/2$ we get $0=1$)