Let $\mathcal A$ be a collection of subsets of $\Bbb R$.
"$\forall n\in \Bbb N$ and $\forall \varepsilon>0$, $\exists A\in\mathcal A$ such that $n<|a|<n+\varepsilon$ for infinitely many $a\in A$."
What is the negation of above statement?
Is this the correct negation? "$\exists n\in \Bbb N$ and $\exists\varepsilon>0$ such that for each $A\in \mathcal{A},
n<|a|<n+\varepsilon$ holds for finitely many $a\in A$."
Some of my friends say that negation is: "$\exists n\in \Bbb N$ and $\exists\varepsilon>0$ such that for each $A\in \mathcal A,
n\ge|a|$ or $|a|\ge n+\varepsilon$ holds for infinitely many $a\in A$."
Which one of these is correct?
Best Answer
As @Omnomnomnom said in his answer (provided that we intend "finitely many" as "only finitely many"), your statement
is the correct negation. Let us see why (it could be useful for negating similar statements).
The statement you want to negate is
which can equivalently be reformulated as
It is clear that the negation of the last statement is the following:
which is clearly equivalent to your negation, because it says that it is impossible to find an infinite subset of $A$ such that "$n<|a|<n+\varepsilon$" holds for all $a$ in this subset.
Now, your friend's negation
is not equivalent to your negation because, according to your friend's negation, it is still possible that "$n<|a|<n+\varepsilon$" does not hold for infinitely many $a \in A$, and "$n<|a|<n+\varepsilon$" holds for infinitely many $a \in A$ as well.