Misapplication of the divergence theorem when calculating a surface integral

multivariable-calculussolution-verificationvector analysis

Let $\mathbf{F} = (3y, -xz, yz^2)$, and let $S=\{(x,y,z): z=\frac{1}{2}(x^2+y^2), z\leq 2\}$. Find $\iint_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) \cdot d\mathbf{S}$.

Firstly, I know I can compute this quite easily using Stokes' theorem — my question concerns only the divergence theorem. Using Stokes' theorem, I obtain an answer of $-20\pi$.

Now below is my working relating to the divergence theorem.


If I let $\Sigma$ be the disc $x^2+y^2\leq 4$ on the plane $z=2$, then $S \cup \Sigma$ is the boundary of $\Omega = \{(x,y,z) : \frac{1}{2}(x^2+y^2)\leq z\leq 2\}$. So by the divergence theorem,
$$ \iiint_\Omega \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} dV = \iint_S \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} + \iint_\Sigma \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S}. $$ For the region $\Sigma$, the unit normal is $(0,0,1)$, so we can calculate the surface integral as
\begin{align*}
\iint_\Sigma \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} &= \iint_{\Sigma} \mathbf{F}\cdot (0,0,1) \,dA \\
&= \iint_{x^2+y^2\leq 4 \\ z=2} yz^2 dA \\
&= 4 \iint_{x^2+y^2\leq 4} y dA \\
&= 4 \int_0 ^{2\pi} \int_0^2 (r\sin\theta) drd\theta \\
&= 4 \int_0 ^{2\pi} 2\sin \theta = 0.
\end{align*}

Also, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = (0,0,2zy)$, so
\begin{align*}
\iiint_\Omega 2zy dV &= 2\int_0^2 \iint _{x^2+y^2\leq 2z} yz\,dV \\
&=2\int_0^2\int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\sqrt{2z} (r\sin\theta z) dr d\theta dz
\end{align*}

but this will still be $0$ because of the presence of $\sin \theta$. This would imply that $\iint_S \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S}=0$.


My question is: what went wrong with the second computation? I think it might be the way I handled the volume integral $\iiint_\Omega$, but I'm not quite sure. Have I misunderstood the divergence theorem? Any guidance would be very much appreciated.

Best Answer

I've figured out my mistake, thanks to @Event Horizon. My impression from the Help Center page is that I shouldn't delete my question, so I'll outline what went wrong:

I should've applied the divergence theorem to $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}$ instead, so that the statement of the theorem becomes $$ \iiint_\Omega \nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) = \iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{S} + \iint_\Sigma \nabla \times \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S}. $$

The left is $0$ by since the divergence of a curl is $0$. From $\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = (z^2+x,0,-z-3)$, the correct computation is $$ \iint_\Sigma \nabla \times \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} = \iint_{x^2+y^2\leq 4 \\ z=2} (-z-3 )dA = \iint-5dA = -20\pi$$ which matches what I got using Stokes' theorem (up to sign - but this just depends on the orientation of $S$).

Related Question