If the graph $X$ of the topologist's sine curve were not connected, then there would be disjoint non-empty open sets $A,B$ covering $X$. Let's assume a point $(x,\ \sin(1/x))\in B$ for some $x>0$. Then the whole graph for positive $x$ is contained in $B$, only leaving the point $(0,0)$ for the set $A$. But any open set about $(0,0)$ would contain $(1/n\pi,\ \sin(n\pi))$ for large enough $n\in\mathbb N$, thus $A$ would intersect $B$.
Let $\mathbb{R}_c$ be $\mathbb{R}$ with the cocountable topology. We'll show that its cone is not locally path-connected, where the cone is $$X=(\mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1])/\sim$$ with $(x,t)\sim (x',t')$ if $t=t'=1$.
Lemma. Let $A$ be an uncountable set with the cocountable topology. Then compact subsets of $A$ are finite and connected subsets are either singletons or uncountable.
Proof. Suppose $B\subset A$ is compact and (countably or uncountably) infinite. Given any countably infinite subset $B_0\subset B$, we can cover $A$ with sets of the form $U_b=b \cup (A \setminus B_0)$ for $b \in B_0$. A finite subcollection of these sets $U_b$ can contain only finitely many elements of $B$, hence $B$ is not compact. Now suppose that $C \subset A$ is connected and contains more than one element. Since finite/countable subspaces in the cocountable topology have the discrete (subspace) topology, $C$ is uncountable. $\square$
Claim 1. Every path into $\mathbb{R}_c$ is constant. Thus no open subsets of $\mathbb{R}_c$ are path-connected; in particular, $\mathbb{R}_c$ is not locally path-connected.
Proof. Let $f:[0,1] \to \mathbb{R}_c$ be continuous. The image $f([0,1])$ is compact and connected, so it must be a singleton set by the lemma. $\square$
Claim 2. The cone on $\mathbb{R}_c$, denoted $X$, is not locally path-connected.
Proof. Fix a point $(x,t)$ in the open subset $\mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1) \subset X$. Any path $f:[0,1] \to\mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1)$ projects to a path $p \circ f:[0,1] \to \mathbb{R}_c$ under the projection $p: \mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1) \to \mathbb{R}_c$. By Claim 1, $p \circ f$ is constant, so all paths into $\mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1)$ have a fixed first coordinate. Because every open neighborhood of $(x,t)$ includes points $(x',t')$ with $x'\neq x$, it follows that no neighborhood of $(x,t)$ is path-connected. Thus $X$ is not locally path-connected. $\square$
Remark. Any uncountable set with the cocountable topology is connected because any two (nonempty) open sets intersect. It follows that open subsets of such a space are themselves uncountable sets with the cocountable (subspace) topology, hence all open subsets are connected. Then certainly the original space is locally connected. Since a finite product of locally connected spaces is locally connected, $\mathbb{R}_c \times [0,1]$ is locally connected. Quotient maps also preserve local connectedness, so this implies that the cone $X$ is locally connected.
Best Answer
The most likely reason is that it is less clear what happens in neighborhoods of $(0,0)$ compared to what happens in neighborhoods of $(0,y)$ for $y\neq 0$. The author is only trying to argue that the space as a whole is not locally connected so does not care whether or not the space is locally connected at $(0,0)$. The author likely felt (either correctly or incorrectly) that more of an argument would be required to demonstrate the lack of local connectivity at this point.
But, you can rest assured knowing that the space is in fact not locally connected at $(0,0)$ and the same argument can be applied here.