Real Analysis – Why Pointwise Bounded Does Not Imply Uniform Bounded

analysisreal-analysis

I was reading Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis, and I came across the definition 7.19, where it says that a sequence of functions $f_n(x)$ is pointwise bounded on E if there exists a finite-valued function $\phi$ defined on E such that
$$ |f_n(x)| < \phi(x) $$
for x element of E, n = 1, 2 ,3 …
While $f_n$ is uniformly bounded on E if there exists a number M s.t.
$|f_n(x)| < M$
for x element of E, n = 1, 2 , 3 …
But if we define the set U as the values of $\phi(x)$ from our first definition and define the sup of the set as R, then don't we get the second definition. Wouldn't that mean that pointwise bounded implies uniform bounded?

Best Answer

The short answer is: there need not be a real number that is the supremum of the values of $\phi(x)$. You may have $\sup\{\phi(x)\mid x \in E\} = \infty$. If that is the case, you're out of luck.

Related Question