[Math] What’s the point of “trigonometric proofs/identities” in introductory calculus/pre-calculus

algebra-precalculustrigonometry

I remember back in high school at some point delving into worksheet after worksheet of trigonometric "identities", the vast majority of which are basically restatements of $\sin^2(x) + \cos^2(x) = 1$ (the remainder use variations of $\sin(x+y)$), e.g. (ignoring domain restrictions):

$$\csc(x) = \frac{\sin(x)}{1+\cos(x)}+\cot(x)$$

$$\frac{1+\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}=\frac{\cos(x)}{1-\sin(x)}$$

The list seems truly never-ending, and while some of them may be pretty to look at due to symmetry, it seems very few are of practical use. I understand a few are helpful for understanding integrals which may come up in, e.g., physics::harmonic motion (e.g., the double angle formulas), but why not cross that bridge when we get to it?

I must be missing something — is there a reason why we spend such an outsized chunk of time in such beginning courses devoted to these exercises in algebraic manipulation?

Best Answer

The point back in high school (for me it was 1973) was to memorize them so you didn't have to stop in the middle of a problem to derive them

Its actually the same reason we learned multiplication tables in elementary school. The younger you are when you memorize them, the more likely they are to stay with you.

Now, I would say it could be useful to identify students capable of eventually handling complex analysis.

Related Question