Hi all, I know there are similar questions on here, but none deal with the fact of trying to prove that $T \geq min\{R,S\}$.
Intuitively this doesn't make sense to me, If you have, $$\sum_{n=n_{0}}^{} (a_{n}+b_{n})x^n$$ Shouldn't this be equal to ;
$$\sum_{n=n_{0}}^{} (a_{n}+b_{n})x^n=\sum_{n=n_{0}}^{} (a_{n})x^n+\sum_{n=n_{0}}^{} (b_{n})x^n$$
And intuitively …at least for me, shouldn't the radius of convergence of the LHS be the minimum of the radii of convergence of the two power series on the RHS?
I can't think of a case for when it is larger than the minimum of the radii of convergence of the two power series on the RHS.
Any help would be much appreciated.
[Math] Radius of Convergence of Sum of two Series.
analysisconvergence-divergencepower seriesreal-analysis
Best Answer
You are correct: as long as both series converge (that is, as long as $\lvert x\rvert\leq\min\{R,S\}$, so that you are inside both radii of convergence), you have $$ \sum_{n=n_0}^{\infty}(a_n+b_n)x^n=\sum_{n=n_0}^{\infty}a_nx^n+\sum_{n=n_0}^{\infty}b_nx^n. $$ But, this doesn't mean that $\min\{R,S\}$ is the best that we can do!
For an example of that, think about the case where there is a lot of cancellation of terms in $a_n+b_n$. Do you see what I'm getting at?