I'll solve the problem in three steps:
(1) First I'll show that any connected graph $G$ with an even number, $2m$, of edges is the edge-disjoint union of $m$ trails of length 2.
(2) If $G$ is a graph with even number of edges and $2n$ vertices of odd degree, and the edges is an edge-disjoint union of trails, it is possible to successively concatenate trails until we are left with $n$ trails all starting and ending in odd degree vertices plus any number of circular trails.
(3) We can merge the circular trails with the $n$ linear trails so as to end up with only $n$ trails.
The reason $n\ge1$ is required is that for $n=0$, i.e. all vertices have even degree, step (3) will end with a single circular trail (an Euler path) with no linear trail to merge it to.
1: Splitting $G$ into 2-trails
Proof goes by induction (or descent): i.e. I reduce the graph to one or more graphs with a smaller number of edges.
Pick a vertex, $x$ of degree 2 or higher: one must exist, or $G$ would have two vertices and one edge only. Decompose $G$ into components $G_1,\ldots,G_k$ which correspond to the connected components after removing $x$ from $G$, but with the vertec $x$ and edges between $x$ and vertices of each $G_i$ included in $G_i$: i.e. two vertices are in the same component if the can be connected by a path not passing through $x$. Each edge of $G$ is then in exactly one of the $G_i$.
If there is only one component, we can pick any two edges at $x$, say $xy$ and $xz$ for vertices $y$ and $z$, form the 2-trail $yxz$ and subsequently remove these two from the graph. If this leaves $x$ with degree zero, we also remove $x$. The remaining graph is still connected and with even number of edges.
If all components have even number of edges, each of these have a smaller number of edges and so follow from the induction hypothesis.
If there are components with an odd number of edges, there must be an even number of these. Take any two of these, pick one edge $xy$ to one of them and one edge $xz$ to the other, form the 2-trail $yxz$ as before, then remove these two edges (and $x$ if left with degree 0). The two selected components may (or may not) get disconnected from the rest of the graph after removing these edges, but each connected component of $G$ after removing $yxz$ will have even number of edges and so be handled by the induction hypothesis.
This procedure (by induction or used iteratively) will reduce $G$ to a disjoint union of trails of length 2.
2: Join 2-paths into maximal paths
If at a vertex $x$ there are two trails that start/end there, join these two trails together. Do this iteratively until no more such cases exist. The only place trails can start/end will be at vertices of odd degree; conversely, at each vertex of odd degree, there must be exactly one trail starting/ending. Hence, we are left with $n$ trails starting/ending in the $2n$ vertices of odd degree, plus any number of circular trails.
Since we start with 2-trails, and the joining of two even length trails remain even, all trails (linear and circular) are of even length.
3: Merge circular trails with linear trails
Take any circular trail, $\omega$, from the set. There must be a vertex $x$ in $\omega$ through which another trail from the set passes which we denote $\gamma$: if not, $\omega$ must contain an entire connected component of $G$. Merge $\gamma$ and $\omega$ together at $x$ into a new trail, also of even length since both $\omega$ and $\gamma$ were. If $\gamma$ is linear, the merged trail is linear; if $\gamma$ is circular, the merged trail is circular. But in either case, the number of circular trails in the set is reduced by 1.
We repeate this step until there are no circular trails left. This requires $n>0$, otherwise we will be left with a single circular Euler path spanning the entire graph which we cannot get rid of.
Q.E.D.
Best Answer
If we remove one of the additional vertices from $G'$, the resulting graph contains an Eulerian walk $W_1$ since there are now two vertices of odd degree. Removing the next additional vertex splits $W_1$ into two walks, let's call them $W_1, W_2$. Removing the next vertex splits one of the walks $W_1, W_2$ into two walks again resulting in walks $W_1, W_2, W_3$. Repeat until all additional vertices have been removed, count the walks produced.
Since an Eulerian walk visits every edge exactly once, splitting it into several parts results in edge disjoint walks and because we only removed the additional edges and vertices, the resulting walks cover $G$.