[Math] Is the Lebesgue integral the completion of integrals on step functions

integration

Lierre gave a very helpful insight at answer 5 on A "clean" approach to integrals.
about what Riemann integrals are. My question relates to whether this can be extended to Lebesgue integrals.

Lierre pointed out that Riemman integrals can be seen as the natural extension of the 'obvious' linear form on characteristic (or 'indicatrix') functions on real line intervals.
There is a theorem which shows that any uniformly continuous function $f$ on a subset $V$ of a metric space $X$ into a complete metric space $Y$ can be uniquely extended to a u.c. function on the closure of $V$ into $Y$.
If we take $X$ and $Y$ as $\mathbb{R}$, and $V$ as being the subspace of real functions on $\mathbb{R}$ spanned by the characteristic functions of closed finite intervals $[a,b]$, and $f$ as the function taking $[a,b]$ to $|a-b|$, it turns out that the Riemann integral is the extension of $f$ to closure of $V$.

My question is this: if we take countable unions of intervals $[a,b]$, with the 'obvious' $f$ defined as a countable sum (if it exists), and the subspace of functions on $\mathbb{R}$ spanned by these as our $V$, is it also true that the closure of $V$ consists of the Lebesgue integrable functions, and that $f$ extends to the Lebesgue integral on them?
Also, how far if at all can one go in proving theorems such as the dominated convergence theorem based purely on the properties f must have as an extension to the closure, without actually constructing the integral itself?
Thanks!

Best Answer

As copper.hat pointed out $C_c(\mathbb{R})$ is dense in $L^1(\mathbb{R})$, so we had to define such an integral for continuous functions with compact support.

The idea to define integral as linear functional is due to Daniell.

As for a good introduction to integration theory from functional analysis point of view see chapter III of An Introduction To Abstract Harmonic Analysis, Loomis,Lynn H..