Is there a way to prove this using sequential compactness instead of open cover definitions?
My first gut reaction was that the fact was obvious since we can show that the closed subset $[a,b]$ is compact in $\mathbb R$.
compactnessgeneral-topology
Is there a way to prove this using sequential compactness instead of open cover definitions?
My first gut reaction was that the fact was obvious since we can show that the closed subset $[a,b]$ is compact in $\mathbb R$.
Best Answer
Although they coincide in metric spaces, in general sequential compactness and compactness are very different properties: neither implies the other, so you can’t expect to use sequential compactness to prove something about compactness. Thus, you’re really talking about two different theorems.
The proof using open covers is trivial.
As you can see, it’s not hard to prove that sequential compactness is inherited by closed sets, but the proof is at least a little more involved than the trivial proof for compactness.