[Math] Gauss-Green Theorem from generalized Stoke’s Theorem.

integrationmanifolds-with-boundarymultivariable-calculus

I am trying to deduce the next identity (Green-Gauss theorem) $$\int_\Omega \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} dx = \int_{\partial \Omega} uv_i dS$$
from the generalized Stoke's theorem for manifolds. Here $u$ is a $C^\infty$ function on an open bounded set $\Omega$ with $C^1$ boundary and $v_i$ denotes the i-th component of the unit normal vector field.

I've been trying to define $n-1$ forms on $\Omega$ whose derivatives are $\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} dx$ to apply the theorem but I cannot prove that those forms have the same integral as $uv_i$ on $\partial \Omega$.

Any ideas?

Also, I would really appreciate references of the proofs of classical calculus integration results using the generalized Stoke's theorem.

Thanks in advance.

Best Answer

First of all, you need to understand what $dS$ is.

$dS$ is the form $dV$ contracted by the vector field $\nu$ on $\partial \Omega$. In other words, to find $dS(v_2,v_3,...,v_{n})$ for tangent vectors $v_2,v_3,...,v_{n}$ to $\partial \Omega$, you just evaluate $dV(\nu, v_2,v_3,...,v_{n})$. The motivation for this definition is that the area of a parallelogram $P$ is the same as the volume of the parallelepiped with base $P$ and height $1$.

So now note that,

$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1} dV = d(f dx_2 \wedge dx_3 \wedge ...\wedge dx_n) $

Letting $ \widehat{dx_1} = dx_2 \wedge dx_3 \wedge ...\wedge dx_n$

Let $p \in \partial \Omega$ and $v_2,v_3,...,v_n \in T_p( \partial \Omega)$ then

$ \begin{align*} f(p) \widehat{dx_1}(v_2,v_3,...,v_n) &= f(p) dV(e_1,v_2,...,v_n)\\ &=f(p) dV(\textrm{proj}_{\nu(p)}(e_1),v_2,...,v_n)\\ &=f(p) dV(\nu_1(p)\nu(p),v_2,...,v_n)\\ &=f(p)\nu_1(p) dV(\nu(p),v_2,...,v_n)\\ &=f(p)\nu_1(p) dS(v_2,...,v_n) \end{align*} $

so as forms on $\partial S$, we have $f\widehat{dx_1} = f\nu_1dS$. The big step is the second line in the equality above, which is justified by writing $e_1$ as a linear combination of $\nu$ and $v_i$'s. All of the $v_i$ terms die because of the alternating property of forms.

Now we conclude that

$\begin{align*} \int_\Omega \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1} dV &= \int_\Omega d(f \widehat{dx_i})\\ &=\int_{\partial \Omega} f \widehat{dx_i} \text{by Stokes' theorem}\\ &=\int_{\partial \Omega} f \nu_1 dS \end{align*} $

If any of this does not make sense, please ask for follow up in the comments. Notation in differential geometry is horrible, and everyone makes it up for themselves I think. So I understand if some part of this is hard to parse. I am also no differential geometer, but I do a lot of calculus in high dimensional spaces (I work in several complex variables). This kind of thing used to frustrate me a lot.