commutative-algebraidealsring-theory
Let $A$ be a commutative ring with identity and $B$ a finitely generated $A$-algebra that is integral over $A$. If $\mathfrak{p}$ is a prime ideal of $A$, there are only finitely many prime ideals $P$ of $B$ such that $P\cap A=\mathfrak{p}$.
Let me say that I am aware of this answer, but I can't follow through the hint. Also, I don't know how to extend to work for algebras rather than extension rings.
I propose the following: suppose $\,U\,$ is not prime, thus there exist $$\,x,y\in R \text{ such that }x,y\notin U\,,\,xy\in U\,.$$ Define now $B:=U+\langle y\rangle$.
By maximality of $\,U\,$ we have that $\,B\,$ is f.g., say $$\,B=\Bigl\langle u_i+r_iy\,,\,1\leq i\leq k\,,\,k\in\mathbb{N}\,\,;\,\,u_i\in U\,,\,r_i\in R\Bigr\rangle$$ and let now $$U_y:=\{s\in R\,\,;\,\,sy\in U\}.$$ (1) Check that $\,U_y\,$ is a proper ideal in $\,R\,$.
(2) Show that $\,U_y\,$ is f.g.
Put $\,U_y=\langle s_1,\ldots,s_m\rangle\,$, and take $\,u\in U\Longrightarrow\,\exists v_1,\ldots,v_k, t_1,\ldots,t_k\in R\,\,s.t.$$$u=\sum_{n=1}^kv_nu_n+\sum_{n=1}^kt_nr_ny.$$ (3) Show that $\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^kt_nr_n}\in U_y.$
(4) Putting $\,\Omega:=\{u_i,\ldots,u_k,ys_1,\ldots,ys_m\}\,$, derive the contradiction $\,U=\langle\Omega\rangle$.
Here is the problem:
and the two problems it refers to:
Scanning through the book, the author uses $j(R)$ to refer to the Jacobson radical and $rad(R)$ for nilradicals, so the OP's interpretation is accurate according to the text.
zcn's adept example of the semilocalization of $\Bbb Z$ at the complemement of $(2)\cup (3)$ readily produces a domain with just three prime ideals (generated by $0$, $2$ and $3$), and of course a domain can't factor into a direct product of rings since it lacks nontrivial idempotent elements, and yet it's not local. The nilradical is zero, but the Jacobson radical is the intersection of the ideals generated by $2$ and $3$, and it is not nilpotent.
We can speculate that the author, at some point in writing or memory, thought that this would work with finitely many prime ideals and their intersection, when actually it should be finitely many maximal ideals and their intersection. In fact, the problem will go through if we assume a nilpotent Jacobson radical and finitely many maximal ideals.
Let's see how things will work out.
Good question indeed! The first obvious candidate is the set of maximal ideals of $R$, which are guaranteed to be comaximal. However, applying the Chinese remainder theorem then only yields an isomorphism of $R/J(R)$ with a product of fields, which isn't exactly what we hoped for. But we are talking about powers of the radical: what about powers of maximal ideals?
Then one gets the idea to check if $\{m_i^n\mid i=1\ldots k\}$ is a set of comaximal ideals, where $n$ is the smallest $n$ such that $J(R)^n=\{0\}$ and the $m_i$ are a complete irredundant set of maximal ideals of $R$. This is indeed the case, and is now your first assigment.$(\ast)$
Once this is done, you can apply the Chinese remainder theorem and conclude that $R/\cap m_i^n\cong \prod R/m_i^n$, and you have two further justifications to convince yourself of $(\ast)$:
The best you can say is this:
A commutative ring is a finite direct product of local rings iff it is a semiperfect ring. (Here semiperfect means "has finitely many maximal ideals and idempotents lift mod $J(R)$.")
This encompasses more direct products of local rings because there are semiperfect rings whose radicals are not nilpotent (any nonfield local domain, for example.) However, if $J(R)$ is nilpotent, then idempotents lift mod $J(R)$, so this does cover the hypotheses above.
I don't think the CRT can prove this general case. Instead, one can show that having finitely many maximal ideals means you can find a maximal set of finitely many mutually orthogonal idempotents $e_1,\ldots e_k$, such that $e_iRe_i$ is a ring in $R$ with only trivial idempotents. Combined with the lifting property, one can then show that $e_iRe_i$ is local for each $i$. Thus $R\cong \prod e_iRe_i$ yields the decomposition.
Don't forget your exercises marked by $(\ast)$s above!
Best Answer
Let $f:A\to B$ be a finite ring homomorphism and $\mathfrak p$ a prime ideal of $A$. Consider $S=A-\mathfrak p$ and the ring homomorphism $S^{-1}f:S^{-1}A\to S^{-1}B$. This is also a finite ring homomorphism and all primes of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak p$ "survive" in $S^{-1}B$. This shows that one can assume $A$ local.
If $A\to B$ is a finite ring homomorphism and $(A,\mathfrak m)$ is a local ring, then all prime ideals of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak m$ contain $\mathfrak mB$. This allows us to replace $A\to B$ by $A/\mathfrak m\to B/\mathfrak mB$ (which is also a finite ring homomorphism), and therefore one can assume that $B$ is a finite algebra over a field. Now we have to prove that any finite algebra over a field has only finitely many prime (maximal) ideals. But such algebra is an artinian ring...