Partial Differential Equations – Clarification on Evans PDE Example 4

partial differential equationssobolev-spaces

I am having trouble understanding the following example from Evans' PDE book. It is as follows (Example 4, p.260, Evans, Partial Differential Equations, 2nd ed.,)

Let $\{r_k\}_1^\infty$ be a countable dense subset of $U=B^0(0,1)$. Write
$$ u(x)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^k}\vert x-r_k \vert^{-\alpha}, \quad x\in U $$
Then $u\in W^{1,p}$ for $\alpha <\frac{n-p}{p}$. If $0<\alpha < \frac{n-p}{p}$ we see that $u\in W^{1,p}(U)$ and yet is unbounded on each open subset of $U$.

The whole example is a bit puzzling to me. The questions I have are:

  1. Why and in what sense is the above infinite sum defined? (Is it uniformly convergent on $U$, if so how do I go about proving it?. Weierstrass $M$ test?
  2. How do I explicitly see $u\in W^{1,p}(U)$ for $\alpha <\frac{n-p}{p}$
  3. What does Evans mean by 'yet is unbounded on each open subset of $U$'.

I would really appreciate a clarification.

Best Answer

First note that if $\alpha<\frac{n-p}{p}$, then the function $v(x)=\frac{1}{|x|^\alpha}$ is such that $v\in W^{1,p}(U)$. You can prove this by using spherical coordinates. Define $$u_k(x)=\left(\sum _{i=1}^k\frac{1}{2^i|x-r_i|^\alpha}\right)^p $$

Note that:

I - $u_k(x)\leq u_{k+1}(x)$ almost everywhere in $U$.

II - $\sup_{k} \int_U u_k<\infty$

I is immediate. To prove II, note that $$\int_U u_k(x)dx=\int_U\sum_{i=1}^k\left(\frac{1}{2^i|x-r_i|^\alpha}\right)^p\tag{1}$$

We can apply Minkowski Integral Inequality in $(1)$ to get $$\int_U u_k(x)dx\leq \left(\sum_{i=1}^k\left(\int_U\frac{1}{2^{ip}|x-r_i|^{\alpha p}}\right)^{1/p}\right)^p$$

Because $v\in L^p(U)$, we conclude from $(1)$ that $$\sup_{k}\int_U u_k(x)dx<\infty$$

From I and II, we can apply the monotone convergence theorem to conclude that $u$ is well defined and $u_k\to u^p$ in $L^1(U)$, which is the same to say that $u_k^{1/p}\to u$ in $L^p(U)$.

Now define $$g(x)=\sum_{i=1}^\infty \nabla \left(\frac{1}{2^i|x-r_i|^\alpha}\right)$$

By using a similar argument as above, you can prove that the sequence of partial sums $(g_k)$ of $g$, converge to $g$ in $L^p(U)$, which implies that $g\in L^p (U)$. Now note that $$\int_U u_k(x)\frac{\partial\varphi(x)}{\partial x_i}dx=-\int_U \frac{\partial g_{i,k}}{\partial x_i}\varphi(x),\ \forall\ \varphi\in C_0^{\infty}(U)\tag{2}$$

where $g_{i,k}=\frac{\partial g_k}{\partial x_i}$. By taking limit in both sides of $(2)$, we conclude that

$$\int_U u(x)\frac{\partial\varphi(x)}{\partial x_i}dx=-\int_U \frac{\partial g_i}{\partial x_i}\varphi(x),\ \forall\ \varphi\in C_0^{\infty}(U)\tag{3}$$

where $g_i$ is the $i$-th entry of $g$. From $(3)$ we conclude that $u\in W^{1,p}(U)$ and $\nabla u=g$.

To answer your third question, note that $u(r_k)=\infty$ for every $k$, and because $(r_k)$ is dense in $U$, we conclude that $u$ is unbounded in each open set contained in $U$.

Related Question