Real Analysis – Converse to Inverse Function Theorem

differential-geometryfunctional-analysisreal-analysis

A fairly general form of the Inverse Function Theorem is:

Suppose $X, Y$ are Banach spaces, $U \subset X$ is open and $f:U \to Y$ is continuously differentiable. If for some $x \in U$ the derivative $Df(x)$ is invertible, then there exists a neighborhood $V \subset f(U)$ such that $f(x) \in V$ and a continuously differentiable function $g: V \to U$ such that $f(g(x)) = x$ for all $x \in V$.

A question I have had is whether there are any sufficient conditions such that the converse holds, i.e., if $Df(x)$ is not invertible then $f$ is locally not invertible.?

Thanks in advance.

Best Answer

I prefer to phrase the question in the positive way: Suppose that $f:U\to V$ is invertible and $C^1$ smooth. Under what additional assumptions can we conclude that $f$ is a diffeomorphism, equivalently, that $Df$ is always invertible?

Results of this kind do exist, but only in finite dimensions as far as I know, and in low dimension at that. Way back in 1936 H. Lewy proved that in two dimensions every harmonic homeomorphism is a diffeomorphism (harmonicity of $f=(f_1,f_2)$ means that $\Delta f_1=\Delta f_2=0$, i.e., the components are harmonic functions). There are generalizations to other elliptic PDE in two dimensions, but unfortunately everything seems to fall apart in higher dimensions. This talk by G. Alessandrini gives an overview of this subject.