In short, row reduced echelon form(RREF) of a matrix $A$ is such that
i) Every leading entry is 1
ii) Any nonzero rows are above zero rows
iii) any leading entry is strictly to the right of any leading entries above that row
iv) any other entry in a column containing a leading entry is 0 except for the leading entry.
So it does not have to be put in augmented matrix $[A|b]$ to get a RRE form. You are comparing RRE form of matrix $A$ and $[A|b]$.
To see why the statement is true, suppose that you put the matrix $[A|b]$ into RRE form, so you have a matrix E. If E contains a leading entry in its last column, in terms of system of equations, what does it say? And what is the condition for E to not have any leading entry in last column?
Note: If RRE form of $[A|b]$ does contain a leading entry, then it is different from that of $A$. Also, note that RRE form of $[A|b]$ is m by n+1 whereas that of $A$ is m by n.
Solve:
$x+y=1$
$x+y=2$
Then we have
$\
A =
\left( {\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 1 \\
1 & 1
\end{array} } \right)
$
$\
b =
\left( {\begin{array}{cc}
1 \\
2
\end{array} } \right)
$
and $Ax=b$
If we turn A into RREF, we get
$\
E =
\left( {\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 1 \\
0 & 0
\end{array} } \right)
$
So A has rank 1
and if we put $[A|b]$ into RRE form, we get
$\
E' =
\left( {\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{array} } \right)
$
So augmented matrix has rank 2. Observe what last row says in terms of equations.
If the augmented matrix has a pivot in its last column, then the system corresponding to that augmented matrix is inconsistent. This is because in the reduced echolon form of the augmented matrix there will be a row of the form $[0\cdots 0\mid c]$ where $c$ is a nonzero number, namely the pivot. This means that $0=c$, implying the inconsistency of the system.
In fact, the same argument sketched above shows that a linear system is consistent if and only if its augmented matrix does not have a pivot in its last column. If no such pivot exists, you can solve the system by back-substitution.
Best Answer
I think its misprinting.
We don't have variable $x_1$ in first row. And we have to write coefficient of $x_1$. That is equal to zero.
But then on right hand side we have -4. So some type of mistake in question.