[Math] Can Cramer’s Rule really distinguish between infinite no. of solutions and no solution

contest-mathdeterminantmatrices

enter image description here

This is a question which was asked in a high-school exam held in India(JEE ADVANCED). Going by Cramer's rule, for infinite solutions, I should get $D=D_1=D_2=D_3=0$ (where $D$ is the original determinant and $D_1, D_2, D_3$ are the respective coefficient determinants). Using these, I arrive at $\alpha^2$=1, so that $\alpha$=1,-1. But, $\alpha=1$ yields no solution here (if I write down the system of equations using $\alpha=1$). Why does it happen so? Is this a rare failure of Cramer's rule? How should we explain this unexpected result?

Best Answer

For Cramer's rule for 3 equations, if $D\ne 0$, then you have a single solution. IF $D=0$ and any one of $D_1, D_2, D_3$ is non-zero, then the system is inconsistent. If all of those are zero, you still have two possibilities, one where the system is indeterminate and one where the system is inconsistent.

Related Question