This is a theorem of Hassler Whitney:
For $0<k<\infty$ and any $n$-dimensional $C^k$ manifold the maximal
atlas contains a $C^\infty$ atlas on the same underlying set.
It seems to me that this theorem says every $C^{k}$ manifold can be thought of as if it were a $C^{\infty}$ manifold proceeding like this:
-
Start with a given a $C^{k}$ atlas $\mathcal{A}$ on a topological
manifold $M$ -
Consider the maximal $C^{k}$ atlas $\overline{\mathcal{A}}$
containing $\mathcal{A}$ (i.e. the atlas containing every
$C^{k}$ chart on $M$ compatible with $\mathcal{A}$) -
Extract a $C^{\infty}$ subatlas $\mathcal{A}_{\infty}$ of
$\overline{\mathcal{A}}$ (it can be done because of Whitney's
theorem) -
Now make $M$ a $C^{\infty}$ manifold considering the atlas
$\mathcal{A}_{\infty}$
After this maneuver we ended up with two differentiable structures over the same underlying topological manifold $M$: one of $C^{k}$ type given by $\mathcal{A}$ and the other of $C^{\infty}$ type given by $\mathcal{A}_{\infty}$.
My questions are:
-
Up to what extent are this two differentiable manifolds,
$(M,\mathcal{A})$ and $(M,\mathcal{A}_{\infty})$, the same? -
Is it true that the maximal atlas $\overline{\mathcal{A}_{\infty}}$
generated by $\mathcal{A}_{\infty}$ is the same as
$\overline{\mathcal{A}}$ with all the non $C^{\infty}$ charts
removed? -
Are there examples of $C^{k}$ manifolds for which exists a
$C^{k}$ atlas such that none of its charts is $C^{r}$ for some
$r>k$? -
When studying functions defined on a $C^{k}$ manifold $M$ we
can consider differentials up to order $k$, with this limit $k$
imposed by the $C^{k}$ differentiable structure. Is the theorem of Whitney
telling us that this restriction is artificial since we can get a
$C^{\infty}$ atlas for $M$?
Thanks.
Best Answer
Let $f:\mathbb R^n\to \mathbb R^n$ be a $C^k$ diffeomorphism which is not $C^{k+1}$ and consider the $C^k$ manifold $M$ whose underlying topological space is $\mathbb R^n$ and whose atlas consists of $f$ and the identity map $Id:\mathbb R^n\to \mathbb R^n:x\mapsto x$ .
If you discard one of the maps you obtain two different $C^\infty$ manifolds $M_{Id}$ and $M_{f}$ whose atlas consists of respectively the single homeomorphism $Id$ and the single homeomorphism $f$.
These different manifolds have the same underlying $C^k$ manifold, namely $M$.
This proves that passing from a $C^k$ manifold to a $C^\infty$ manifold is indeed always possible, but not in a canonical way. The same is true for passing from $C^k$ to $C^{k+1}$.
Remark
The existence of a $C^k$ diffeomorphism $f$ which is not $C^{k+1}$ is probably easy to prove but the only reference I could find (by browsing the web for two minutes...) is for the case $n=2$ in this probably much too sophisticated article .