[Math] Adapting a proof on elements of order 2: from finite groups to infinite groups

abstract-algebrafinite-groupsgroup-theory

Consider the following problem, appropriate for a first course in Group Theory:

Problem: Prove that there cannot be a group with exactly two elements of order $2$.

General Proof: Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there are exactly two elements of order $2$, and denote them by $a$ and $b$. Note $ab \neq a, b, e$ so that $(ab)^2 \neq e$ or else we'd have a third element of order $2$. From here, one can show that $aba \neq a, b, e$, and then observe that $(aba)^2 = e$, giving a third element of order $2$. Contradiction.

Finite Group Proof: Given a finite group $G$, we can prove the statement as follows:

Suppose $a, b \in G$ are the only elements with order $2$. Observe $\{e, a\} \subset G$ is a subgroup with $2$ elements, so (by Lagrange's Theorem) $G$ has an even number of elements.

Create the Cayley table for $G$ and consider the NW/SE diagonal, on which $e$ will appear exactly three times: $e*e, a*a,$ and $b*b$. For any other elements whose product is $e$, they will appear in the table in pairs: if $x*y = e$ for $x \neq y$ then $y*x = e$ as well.

Thus, the total number of $e$'s in the table is odd: the three in the diagonal plus the even number that come in pairs. But the number of $e$'s in the table should be even: one for each row, and we proved $G$ has an even number of elements. Contradiction.

Question: Can the latter approach be adapted to cover the case for infinite groups?

Best Answer

One can show that the subgroup generated by $a$ and $b$ is finite, so that the problem is reduced to the finite case. Then, the same argument applies.