I have one basic doubt regarding Null vector.
By definition of Dot product if $\vec{a}$ is any vector and $\vec{b}$ is Null vector then its obvious that $$\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=0 \tag{1}$$ that is a Null vector is Orthogonal to any vector.
Similarly By definition of cross product if $\vec{a}$ is any vector and $\vec{b}$ is Null vector then its obvious that $$\vec{a} \times\vec{b}=\vec0 \tag{2}$$ that is a Null vector is parallel to any vector.
But by definition of null vector, Null vector is a vector with zero magnitude and no Specific direction (Points in different directions viewing it as circle with zero radius). So practically how can $(1)$ and $(2)$ be true?
Best Answer
That's a "problem" that arises often if some Null (may it be a number, a vector, the empty set or whatever) is involved. Many properties hold at once for the Null (so your statements (1) and (2)) or are obviously not satisfied (like $0\in\mathbb R$ can't be inverted).
So, when you are going to define some mathematical terms (e.g. "orthogonal" or "parallel"), you have to decide:
or
As mathematics deals with rather general terms, in general the first option is preferred (unless you work onlay with simple structures, where the second option is easier to grasp).
This approach works very well, but with the consequence that in simple cases the statements sound a bit odd if compared to the everyday experience. (As the Null vector is orthogonal to itself, or - regarding group theory - as the trivial permutation is a symmetry.)
In your case you have to consider the given definition of "orthogonal" and "parallel".
(As you see, the second more vivid definition causes theorems where special cases are excluded, which is very annoying when working with a bunch of such theorems. You have always to check if there is maybe some Null.)
In short: It all depends on the used definition of some mathematical term.