[Math] A problem with a proof of Bessel’s inequality, and how to get Parseval’s identity from it

functional-analysishilbert-spaces

I am studying functional analysis, and I think there is a problem
with the proof written in my notes for Bessel's inequality.

The theorem is:

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and $\{u_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha\in A}$be an
orthonormal set, then $$ \sum_{\alpha\in A}|\langle
x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}\leq||x||^{2} $$

The proof (in short):

Let $F\subseteq A$ be a finite subset, denote $$
V_{F}=SP\{u_{\alpha}:\alpha\in F\} $$

We have see that $$ \forall x\in H:\, P_{V_{F}}(x)=\sum_{\alpha\in
F}\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle u_{\alpha} $$

[Where we denoted $P_{W}$ as the orthogonal projection on $W$].

Since for every orthogonal projection $P_{W}$ we have that
$||P_{W}||=1$ [proof included] we have that $$ \sum_{\alpha\in
A}|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}=||P_{V_{F}}(x)||\leq||x||^{2} $$

I disagree with the last line.

First, I think that it is not true that
$$
\sum_{\alpha\in A}|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}=||P_{V_{F}}(x)||
$$

or that

$$
||P_{V_{F}}(x)||\leq||x||^{2}
$$

but rather that
$$
\sum_{\alpha\in A}|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}\leq||P_{V_{F}}(x)||^{2}
$$

and then I can say
$$
||P_{V_{F}}(x)||^{2}\leq||x||^{2}
$$

I think that
$$
\sum_{\alpha\in A}|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}\leq||P_{V_{F}}(x)||^{2}
$$

follows since (I think that):
$$
||P_{V_{F}}(x)||=\sum_{\alpha\in A}|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|
$$

and when squaring the sum I have the squares of each term, as well
as some other non-negative elements.

Am I correct ?

How do I get Parseval's identity (equality in Bessel's inequality
under some assumptions about the $\{u_{\alpha}\}$ ) from it ? I don't
know what to say about a product of the form
$$
|\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|\cdot|\langle x,u_{\beta}\rangle|
$$

I would like it (and all other elements that are not the $\langle x,u_{\alpha}\rangle|^{2}$
to be $0$, but I don't see why this would happen).

Best Answer

It should indeed be $\lVert P_{V_F}(x)\rVert^2$, but with an equality,

$$\begin{align} \lVert P_{V_F}(x)\rVert^2 &= \left\langle \sum_{\alpha \in F} \langle x,u_\alpha\rangle u_\alpha,\, \sum_{\beta \in F} \langle x, u_\beta\rangle u_\beta\right\rangle\\ &= \sum_{\alpha \in F}\langle x, u_\alpha\rangle \left\langle u_\alpha,\, \sum_{\beta \in F} \langle x, u_\beta\rangle u_\beta\right\rangle\\ &= \sum_{\alpha \in F}\sum_{\beta \in F} \langle x, u_\alpha\rangle \overline{\langle x, u_\beta\rangle}\langle u_\alpha, u_\beta\rangle\\ &= \sum_{\alpha \in F}\sum_{\beta \in F} \langle x, u_\alpha\rangle \overline{\langle x, u_\beta\rangle} \delta_{\alpha\beta}\\ &= \sum_{\alpha \in F} \lvert \langle x,u_\alpha\rangle\rvert^2. \end{align}$$

Then you have $\lVert P_{V_F}(x)\rVert^2 \leqslant \lVert x\rVert^2$ by $\lVert P_{V_F}\rVert \leqslant 1$.

To obtain Parseval's identity, consider that for any $x \in H$, there is a countable subset $C = \{ \alpha_k : k \in \mathbb{N}\} \subset A$ with

$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=0}^n \langle x, u_{\alpha_k}\rangle u_{\alpha_k} = x,$$

(the necessary condition for Parseval's identity is that the span of the $u_\alpha$ is dense, since only a countable number of coefficients can be nonzero, for each $x$ you get a countable subset $C$), then you can write

$$x = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \langle x, u_{\alpha_k}\rangle u_{\alpha_k}$$

and compute $\lVert x\rVert^2$ like $\lVert P_{V_F}(x)\rVert^2$ was computed above.