You have $$y_t=f(0)x_0+\int_0^t (f'(s)x_s-ay_s)\,ds+\sigma\int_0^t f(s)\,dB_s.$$ Take $f(t)=e^{at}$. In this way, you have $f'(s)x_s-ay_s=0$ and therefore $$e^{at}x_t=x_0+\sigma\int_0^t e^{as}\,dB_s\Rightarrow x_t=e^{-at}\left(x_0+\sigma\int_0^t e^{as}\,dB_s\right).$$
When you have a deterministic function $f\in L^2[0,t]$, one has $\int_0^t f(s)\,dB_s\sim N(0,\Vert f\Vert_{L^2[0,t]}^2)$. Hence,
$$ x_t\sim N\left(e^{-at}x_0,\,e^{-2at}\sigma^2\int_0^t e^{2as}\,ds=\frac{1-e^{-2at}}{2a}\sigma^2\right).$$
You have some (typo ?) issue in your definition. An Itô process $(I_t)$ is a stochastic process which can be written as $$X_t = X_0 + \int_{s=0}^t \mu_s ds + \int_{s=0}^t\sigma_sdB_s $$
Where $(B_t)$ is a standard Brownian motion and $(\mu_t)$ (drift) and $(\sigma_t)$ (diffusion) are two stochastic processes adapted to $(B_t)$.
As two extremely elementary examples of Itô processes, you can think of the Brownian motion $(B_t)$, which can be written as $B_t =0 + \int_{s=0}^t 0\ ds + \int_{s=0}^t1\ dB_s$, or the deterministic process $(t)$, which writes $ t = 0 + \int_{s=0}^t 1\ ds + \int_{s=0}^01\ dB_s $.
Now Itô's lemma states that, given an Itô process $(X_t)$ with drift $ (\mu_t)$ and diffusion $ (\sigma_t)$, and a twice differentiable function $f(\cdot,\cdot)$, the process $(f(t,X_t)) $ is also an Itô process with drift $ (\mu_t^f) = \left({\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}(t,X_t)+\mu _{t}{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x}}(t,X_t)+{\frac {\sigma _{t}^{2}}{2}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}f}{\partial x^{2}}}(t,X_t)\right)$ and diffusion $(\sigma_t^f) = \sigma _{t}{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x}}(t,X_t)$.
In other words,
$$f(t,X_t) = f(X_0) + \int_{s=0}^t \mu_s^f ds + \int_{s=0}^t\sigma_s^f\ dB_s \tag1$$
To apply that in the setting of example a), we identify :
$(B_t)$ is an Itô process with drift $0$ and diffusion $1$, $(X_t) = (B_t^2) = f(t,B_t)$ with $f(t,x) := x^2$. As you did, we compute every derivative term that appear in the formula of Itô's lemma :
$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(t,B_t) =0,\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(t,B_t) = 2B_t,\; \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}(t,B_t) =2$$
Now we can plug the values in to get $\mu^f$ and $\sigma^f$ :
$$\mu^f_t = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1 \;\text{ and } \sigma^f_t = 1\times2B_t = 2B_t $$
We can finally plug in these expressions in $(1)$ to get the solution :
$$\begin{align}B_t^2 = f(t,B_t) &= B_0^2 + \int_{s=0}^t \mu_s^f ds + \int_{s=0}^t\sigma_s^f\ dB_s\\
&=0+ \int_{s=0}^t 1\ ds + \int_{s=0}^t2B_s dB_s\\
&=\int_{s=0}^t \ ds + \int_{s=0}^t2B_s dB_s \ \; \; \; \; \blacksquare \end{align} $$
If you understood this, you can proceed the same exact way to solve example b). I let you do the calculations yourself ;)
Best Answer
To see that $B_t$ itself is an Ito process, it suffices to verify that $$B_t = \int_0^t 1\,dB_s\tag{*}$$ since then the definition holds with $X_0 = 0$, $a_s = 0$ and $\phi_s = 1$. And Equation (*) can be shown directly from the definition of the Ito integral, without needing to apply Ito's formula: the Riemann sums appearing in the definition of $\int_0^t 1\,dB_s$ will all telescope. So nothing is circular.