Is $(a)/(a^2)\cong R/(a)$, or something else? ; For ideals $(a), (a^2)\leq R$

commutative-algebraidealsproof-verificationring-theory

(Rings are commutative with 1)

In a lecture on introductory commutative algebra, I was presented with an exercise that basically just asked:

For a non zero-divisor $a\in R$, we have $(a)/(a^2)\cong$ ?

Well, a tempting guess would be $(a)/(a^2)\cong (1)/(a)\cong R/(a)$.

Trying to prove this, I just went on to construct the most natural isomorphisms I could think of. I first wrote down the proof, and later realized it had an error. I tried to fix it, but it seems whatever direction I choose, I always run into a similar problem like below; In showing $\psi$ being a ring homomorphism. I have left the proof as I first wrote it down, but with an adjustment pointing out the problem. (It's probably silly simple, it always tends to be when I stare too long at a problem.)

Question(s): Are there more problems with the proof below, and can I fix it; And if so, how?


Proof attempt. Let $\psi: (a)/(a^2)\to R/(a)$ be defined as $\psi(\bar{ar})=r+(a)=\bar{r}$.

Then, $\psi$ is well defined, since for some $r_1,r_2\in R$

$\overline{ar_1}=\overline{ar_2}\Rightarrow ar_1-ar_2=a(r_1-r_2)\in (a^2)\Rightarrow a(r_1-r_2)=a^2r_3=a(ar_3),$ for some $r_3\in R$

$\Rightarrow r_1-r_2=ar_3\Rightarrow r_1-r_2\in (a)\Rightarrow\bar{r_1}=\bar{r_2}\in R/(a)$.

Further, $\psi$ is a ring homomorphism since

$\psi(\overline{ar_1}+\overline{ar_2})=\psi(\overline{ar_1+ar_2})=\psi(\overline{a(r_1+r_2)})=\overline{r_1+r_2}=\bar{r_1}+\bar{r_2}=\psi(\overline{ar_1})+\psi(\overline{ar_2})$

$\psi(\overline{ar_1ar_2})=\psi(\overline{a^2r_1r_2)})\not=\bar{r_1}\bar{r_2}=\psi(\overline{ar_1})\psi(\overline{ar_2}) )$ $\rightarrow$ Problem!

In fact, as far as I can see, any product $\bar{ar_1}\bar{ar_2}$ in $(a)/(a^2)$ is $\bar{0}$.

Also, $\psi$ is surjective, since for any $\bar{r}\in R/(a)$, there is $\overline{ar}\in (a)/(a^2)$ s.t. $\psi(\overline{ar})=\bar{r}$ ;
And $\psi$ is injective since $\ker \psi = \{ar+(a^2)|r\in(a)\}=(a^2)=\bar{0}.$


Bonusquestion(s): Do ideals generated by one or more elements in a ring obey more canonical laws like this, such as $(a_1,a_2)/(a_1)=(a_2); (a_1,a_2)(b_1,b_2)=(a_1b_1,a_2b_2);$ and so on. Would someone refer me to some collected proofs of such if something like that exists. Can we give such ideals in a ring a ring structure on their own or something similar?

UPDATE: I have realized that we would run into the following problem, if my intuitive guess was correct:

By the third isomorphism theorem we have $(R/(a^2))/((a)/(a^2))\cong R/(a) \cong (a)/(a^2)$. This means we have a situation of $A/I=I$. This should not be nontrivially possible since $A$ unital implies $1+I$ is a unit in $A/I$, while $I$ contains no units if proper.

Best Answer

Note that $(a)/(a^2)$ is not a ring (in general), but it is an $R$-module.

A good starting point is to consider the module homomorphism $f\colon R\to (a)/(a^2)$ defined by $f(x)=ax+(a^2)$. The map $f$ is surjective, so we can say that $$ (a)/(a^2)\cong R/\!\ker f $$ and it remains to determine $\ker f=\{x\in R:ax\in(a^2)\}$, which is usually denoted by $(a^2):a$.

This is an ideal of $R$ that contains $(a)$, but can be different. Indeed, if $a$ is a zero divisor and $ab=0$, with $b\ne0$, then $b\in\ker f$ but $b$ need not belong to $(a)$.

Note that your map $(a)/(a^2)\to R/(a)$ is generally not well-defined, because it only is when $\ker f=(a)$.

If $a$ is not a zero divisor, then $ax\in(a^2)$ implies $ax=a^2y$, for some $y$, and so $x=ay\in(a)$.

An example where $\ker f\supsetneq(a)$ is given by $R=\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}$ and $a=(2,0)$. Then $$ (a^2):a=\{(x,y)\in R: (x,y)(2,0)\in(a^2)\} $$ and this is $2\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}\ne(a)=2\mathbb{Z}\times\{0\}$.

Indeed, $(a)/(a^2)\cong\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, but $R/(a)\cong\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}$.