If $X_n>0$ and $X_n\uparrow X$ with $E(X)<\infty$, then $E(X_n|\mathcal{F})\uparrow E(X|\mathcal{F})$.

measure-theoryprobability theoryreal-analysis

The theorem below is from Durret's Probability Theory and Example. I am struggling to follow the proof of (c). I will try to give all my thought here. By the definition of conditional expectation and (b), we have for all $A\in \mathcal{F}$
$$
\int_A X_n dP = \int_A E(X_n|\mathcal{F})dP\leq \int E(X|\mathcal{F})dP=\int_A XdP
$$

So by the squeeze theorem, $\int_A E(X_n|\mathcal{F})dP\rightarrow \int_A E(X|\mathcal{F})dP$. The tricky part is then to show this implies $ E(X_n|\mathcal{F}\rightarrow E(X|\mathcal{F})$ almost surely.

Durret's approach seems to use dominated convergence theorem and this property of integral (link to another SE question). However, I don't exactly follow his steps. Why does $Y_n\downarrow 0\implies Z_\infty$ exists? What is the random variable with finite expectation that bounds $Z_n$ (in order to use DCT)? I guess $Y_1$ works beause $E(Y_1)=E(X)-E(X_1)<\infty$ where $0\leq E(X_1\leq E(X)<\infty$.

A longer proof would be most welcome (or explain all four steps in the proof).


enter image description here

Proof:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Best Answer

Please let me know if the following is not clear. All equalities and inequalities of conditional expectations hold a.s. Now consider $(Z_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ which are versions of the conditional expectations $E[Y_n|\mathscr{F}]$ and some $$\omega \in \bigcap_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\{Z_n=E[Y_n|\mathscr{F}]\}\cap \{E[Y_{n+1}|\mathscr{F}]\leq E[Y_{n}|\mathscr{F}]\}\cap \{E[Y_n|\mathscr{F}]\geq 0\}$$ This implies $0\leq ...\leq Z_{n+1}(\omega)\leq Z_{n}(\omega)\leq ...\leq Z_1(\omega)$. Since the sequence $(Z_n(\omega))_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is monotone decreasing and bounded below by $0$, it has a limit $\lim_nZ_n(\omega)=\inf_nZ_n(\omega)$. Now, also note $Z:=\inf_nZ_n$ is a measurable function. So we conclude that $\omega \in \{Z_n\to Z\}$; since $\omega$ was arbitrary, we have the set inclusion and $$P(Z_n\not\to Z)\leq \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}}(P(Z_n\neq E[Y_n|\mathscr{F}])+P(E[Y_{n+1}|\mathscr{F}]> E[Y_{n}|\mathscr{F}])+P(E[Y_n|\mathscr{F}]< 0))=0$$ since the sets we are measuring on the rhs of the inequality have probability zero. So $Z_n \to Z$ a.s. By definition, we also have that $0\leq Z_n\leq Z_1,\,\forall n$ a.s. so we can apply DCT.

Related Question