If $X$ is first-countable then a net converges when a subsequence converges

examples-counterexamplesfirst-countablegeneral-topologynetssequences-and-series

Let be $X$ and we assume that $(x_\lambda)_{\lambda\in\Lambda}$ is a net such that there exists a cofinal and increasing map $\varphi$ form $\Bbb N$ to $\Lambda$ such that $\big(x_{\varphi(n)}\big)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ converges to any $x_0\in X$: so if $X$ is first countable then the convergence of $\big(x_{\varphi(n)}\big)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ to $x_0$ implies the convergence of $(x_\lambda)_{\lambda\in\Lambda}$ to $x_0$? If the answer to the last question is negative then there is a relevant reason different form this or this or rather this that show why into first countable space is sufficent to consider only sequence?

Best Answer

As Ruy suggested above into the comments the conjecture is generally false: e.g. the sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ defined as $$ x_n:=\begin{cases}0,\,\text{if }n\,\text{is even}\\n,\,\text{if }n\,\text{is even}\end{cases} $$ is a sequence into a first countable space that does not converege but it has trivially a converging subsequence.

Related Question