From "A course in Universal Algebra" of Burris and Sankappanavar, exercise 4 page 16.
If $L$ is a finite lattice let $J(L)$ be the poset of join irreducible elements of $L$, where $a \le b$ in $J(L)$ means $a \le b$ in $L$. Show that if L is a finite distributive lattice then $L$ is isomorphic to $L(J(L))$, the lattice of nonempty lower segments of $J(L)$.
What I have tried
I have tried to use the isomorphism of $L$ with the lattice of its principal ideals. I would prove that:
$\{x\in J(L)| x \le a \} \cup \{x\in J(L)| x \le b \} = \{x\in J(L)| x \le a\lor b \}$
But i need to show that the meet of two join irreducible elements is join irreducible, is this true in distributive lattices? There are minimum conditions for this to be true?
Best Answer
Welcome to MSE!
Unfortunately, it is not true that the meet of two join-irreducible elements is always join-irreducible. For a simple example, consider:
here $d$ and $e$ are both join irreducible, but their meet is not.
The "standard" proof (that is, the proof that I am most familiar with) of Birkhoff's theorem goes as follows:
First, show that join-irreducible elements act like primes, in the following sense:
This is where we (heavily) use distributivity of our lattice. It is analogous to the statement "If $p$ is prime, and $p \mid a_1 \times a_2 \times \cdots \times a_n$ then actually $p \mid a_i$ for some $i$".
Next, we show that every element of our lattice can be "factored" into join-irreducibles. This is where we heavily use finiteness of our lattice (a chain condition would work for this lemma too). You will need the first lemma while proving it.
This is analogous to the unique factorization of some integer into primes.
Finally, we consider the map $\varphi : L \to L(J(L))$ given by
$$\varphi(x) = \{p \in J(L) ~|~ p \leq x\}$$
Can you show that this map is an isomorphism?
Edit:
It is worth noting that we can go the other way as well. Instead of sending $L \to L(J(L))$, we can send a poset $P$ to $J(L(P))$ by $\psi(y) = \langle y \rangle$. This is also an isomorphism!
This information together shows that $\varphi$ and $\psi$ actually form an Equivalence of Categories between the category of finite posets (with monotone maps) and the category of finite distributive lattices (with bounded homomorphisms). For more information, see this wikipedia page.
I hope this helps! ^_^