Consider the vector field $\mathbb{v} = \operatorname{curl}\mathbb{u}$, where
$\mathbb{u} = (xy, xz^2, x^2y)$.
Find the flux of $\mathbb{v}$
downwards (negative z-component) through the paraboloid $z = 1 – x^2 – y^2$, where $x \geq 0$
and $z \geq 0$.
So, $\mathbb{v} = (x^2-2xz, -2xy, z^2-x)$. Tried then apply the divergence theorem, but found out that it probably wouldn't work as the surface is open.
Kind of lost on where to go from here. I think the next step would be to just compute
$$\iint_{S} \mathbb{v}\cdot\mathbb{n}\;dS,$$
but I have to parametrize the surface first? No idea how to do that, or if I'm going in the right direction.
Best Answer
Hints: You may parametrize the paraboloid with the coordinates $$\begin{cases} x(\rho,\theta) = \rho\cos\theta, \\ y(\rho,\theta) = \rho\sin\theta, \\ z(\rho,\theta) = 1 - x(\rho,\theta)^2 - y(\rho,\theta)^2 = 1-\rho^2 \end{cases}$$ where $\rho$ and $\theta$ range in a suitable domain (look at the way your paraboloid was defined), which is going to determine the limits of your integrals later on.
Then the “directed surface element” $d\mathbf a = \hat{\mathbf n}\ da$ is given by $$\pm \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial \rho}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial \rho}, \frac{\partial z}{\partial \rho}\right) \times \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} , \frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta} \right) \ d\rho\ d\theta, $$ where the sign depends on the choice of normal direction.
Much simpler solution: the full paraboloid $z=1-x^2-y^2$, together with the planes $x=0$ and $z=0$, bound the compact set $$K = \left\{ (x,y,z)\in \mathbb R^3\ |\ x\in [0,1], y\in \left[-\sqrt{1-x^2},\sqrt{1-x^2}\right],\ z\in [0,1-x^2-y^2]\right\} ,$$ which is half of a “capped paraboloid” resting on the $xy$-plane. In other words, the boundary $\partial K$ is comprised of a vertical wall lying on the $yz$-plane, a horizontal wall lying on the $xy$-plane, and the portion $S$ of the paraboloid through which we are supposed to calculate the flux.
The total flux through $\partial K$, by the divergence theorem, is equal to the integral of the divergence over $K$ (which is easy: what is the divergence of a curl?), so the flux through $S$ is the same as the flux through the two walls, modulo sign...