Example where character table and Frobenius-Schur index doesn’t determine the group.

charactersgroup-theoryrepresentation-theory

It is well known that the complex character table does not determine the group. The classical example always given is of a pair of groups of order $8$, the dihedral group $D_8$ and the Quaternion group $Q_8$.

However these have different real representation theory – $\mathbb{R}[Q_8] = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{H}$ and $\mathbb{R}[D_8] = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times M_2(\mathbb{R})$.

This can be deduced from the complex character table as the Frobenius-Schur index of the 2 dimensional representation is 1 for $D_8$ and -1 for $Q_8$.

This then gives that the groups are non isomorphic.

I was wondering what the smallest (or just any) example of two non isomorphic groups with identical character tables and Frobenius Schur indicators was.

Many thanks in advance!

Best Answer

The two nonisomorphic nonabelian groups of order $p^3$ for odd primes $p$ have the same character tables and the same Frobenius-Schur indicators - these are $0$ for all except the trivial character. I would guess that the nonabelian groups of order $27$ are the smallest such examples, but I haven't checked.