Calculating the Divergence of a Tensor

Question

I am working through a fluid dynamics paper and came across this equation:
$$ \frac{\partial \vec{v}}{\partial t} + \vec{v}\cdot\nabla\vec{v}=\nabla\cdot T – \frac{1}{\rho}\nabla \phi\tag1$$
where T is a tensor defined by
$$ T_{ij} = -\frac{p}{\rho}\delta_{ij} + \nu\left(\frac{\partial v_i}{\partial x_j}+\frac{\partial v_j}{\partial x_i}\right) – \beta\gamma\frac{\partial c}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial c}{\partial x_j} $$
The paper is concerned with 2D so $\vec{x}=(x,z)$ and $\vec{v}=(u,w)$. I started by writing out the individual components of the tensor $T$ and could pretty easily see that it is symmetric (not sure if this matters). I wanted to then write out the component-wise equations of $(1)$ but to do that I needed to expand $\nabla\cdot T$ but I honestly have no idea how to do that. A quick google search says that it should be:
$$ \nabla \cdot T = T_{ik,i}\cdot e_k $$
This doesn't really seem to make any sense to me though. For instance, in my case (for 2D) what are the values of $i$ and $k$ that I should be ranging over? Also what is the meaning of that comma in the index for the tensor – it is not anywhere included in the definition of $T$. An explanation of how to generally find the divergence of a tensor would be much appreciated. Also perhaps a simpler example worked out.

Answer 1

The notation you found through google does not really make sense with the dot, but is ok without the dot. It means (in dimension $3$) $$ \nabla\cdot T = T_{ik,i}\,e_k = \sum_{i=1}^3 \sum_{k=1}^3 \partial_{x_i}(T_{ik})\, e_k, $$ by the convention of summation over repeated indices. Hence, it is the vector with $k$-th coordinate $$ (\nabla\cdot T)_k = \sum_{i=1}^3 \partial_{x_i}(T_{ik}). $$