Are trig functions only defined for unit circles

algebra-precalculuscirclesdefinitiontrigonometry

In my textbooks the trig functions are defined with the help of a unit circle. So does it always have to be a circle with radius $1$ unit? Can't we define trig functions with the help of a circle with some other radius of $2$ or $3$ or $4$ units?

And if suppose it is possible to define trig functions on a circle of radius $2$ units then is this expression still valid: $\sin x:\mathbb{R}\to[-1,1]$?

Best Answer

If we treat trigonometric functions as ratios, then any circle works (in Euclidean space); the ratio of the vertical coordinate of a point on a circle to that circle's radius is equal to the sine of the angle that the ray from the origin to that point makes with the $x$-axis, as measured in the counter-clockwise direction. However, the whole point of the unit circle is to identify sine with $y$ and cosine with $x$. By using the unit circle, and taking the convention that the angle starts at the $x$-axis and goes counter-clockwise, we can use the $x$-coordinate interchangeably with cosine, and $y$ with sine; because the radius is one, taking the ratio between anything and the radius just results in the original value, and thus we can dispense with that part of the definition. So using a circle with radius $2$ would eliminate a simplification that is one of the main motivations for using the unit circle.

However, in a way we can use any circle. Consider the word "unit". It's often used in math to mean "$1$", but if you think of it as literally a "unit", then a unit circle is one in which the basic unit is the radius. If you have a circle with a radius of $1$ meter, then it's a unit circle if you measure every distance in meters. If you have a circle with radius $1$ inch, then it's a unit circle if you measure every distance in inches. So one interpretation of the unit circle is "If you measure the distance from the $x$-axis, and use the radius as your unit, then the number you get is sine".