Are the following logical statements all axioms of propositional calculus

axiomspropositional-calculus

I have found conflicting lists of axioms in propositional calculus in Kleene, $2002$, and on Wikipedia. From what I can tell, carefully reasoning through each of the statements reveals that are tautologies, and since the only real understanding I have surroundings logical axioms is that they are tautologies, I can't quite decide which source to trust.

Wikipedia's axioms:enter image description here

Kleene's axioms:
enter image description here

Any help is appreciated, thank you.

Best Answer

There are many different (but equivalent) axiomatizations of propositional calculus. See e.g. List of Hilbert systems.

The fist nine are the same.

Kleene's version does not use the $\Leftrightarrow$ connectives; thus, the last three axioms of Wiki's list are not needed in Kleene's version.

The only real difference regards the axioms fo $\lnot$.

Kleene's axiom 10 is Double Negation elimination : it is equivalent to LEM (axiom not-3).