google mapsleafletopenstreetmap
I am using LeafletJs as mapping library for OpenStreetMaps. Is there any method map.Tilt() in Leaflet api like google provides
map = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById('map-canvas'), {
zoom: 18,
center: new google.maps.LatLng(35.8313284, -82.7251666),
mapTypeId: google.maps.MapTypeId.SATELLITE,
heading: 90,
tilt: 30
});
I need not SATELLITE view. Recently i am viewing markers like this. I need to show in 20/30 degree angled the map.
What you are requiring sounds like Map Channels (v4) or MapFab
It's Simple you sign up and load your data from Google Spreadsheets in and you can edit/filter data. This does not edit data directly with the map.
http://www.mapchannels.com/MC4Demo.aspx
If you want edit data directly on the map I suggest: MapFab
http://www.mapfab.com/editor/new
(both use google ads to generate the income.)
Vector tiles frequently only go up to zoom 14, and that seems to be the case here. Vector tiles can store information at different resolutions, but 4096x4096 is frequently used. Vector tiles with 4096 resolution can contain enough information that they can be rendered into rasters up to zoom 18 without any loss of resolution.
Many tile sets will simplify the geometries contained in the vector tiles so there is only enough information to render pixel perfect rasters at 512x512 px at lower zoom levels, but not apply the simplification at the highest zoom level vector tiles. This makes the highest zoom level tiles significantly larger than the lower zoom levels, but that size increase is more than made up for by not having to store and transfer the higher zoom level tiles.
The solution here is to render the zoom 14 tiles at higher zoom levels, the way to accomplish that will vary depending on the rendering library you are using, but any respectable vector tile rendering library should have a way to do it.
Best Answer
There is no builtin functionality for this in Leaflet, and no plugin to do it that I am aware of either.
You could maybe produce something like it with some CSS
transform3dhack, but it would likely look pretty horrible.In general, I think OpenLayers 3 might be more suited for pseudo-3d functionality. I have not used OpenLayers 3 myself, though.