Solved – When would maximum likelihood estimates equal least squares estimates

least squaresmaximum likelihood

Under what situations would MLE (Maximum Likelihood Estimates) equal LSE (Least Squares Estimates)?

I got an impression that under norm 2 ($L_{2}$), MLE and LSE are equal.

For example, the process of solving $\mathrm{min}||y−Ax||_{2}$ is actually the MLE estimation of parameter $A$ for random variable $y=Ax+\epsilon$ where $x$ and $\epsilon$ is normal.

However, is that generally true that the minimization problem under $L_{2}$ norm is the same as maximum likelihood estimation? For example, consider a quadratic function $f(X) = XAX$, can minimizing the distance between $f(X)$ and some value $Y$ under $L_{2}$ can be solved by MLE?

Best Answer

When the statistical properties of the underlying data-generating process are "normal", i.e., error terms are Gaussian distributed and iid. In this case, the maximum likelihood estimator is equivalent to the least-squares estimator.

Related Question