I'm using a M-W U test to analyse some Likert scale results I have, as my data is ordinal.
One of the assumptions that keeps on appearing on references is the following: "both distributions must be the same shape (i.e., the distribution of scores for both categories of the independent variable must have the same shape).
If I fail this assumption, and therefore am unable to use M-W U, what can I use instead?
EDIT: I cannot add images, but will try to explain what my data looks like.
I have two groups based on my IV ("Yes" and "No"), charted on a boxplot with y-axis ranging from 1 – 5. For "Yes", I have a box extending from 4 to 5, with no variance. For "No", the box ranges from 3.5 to 4.5, with variance from 2.0 to 3.5, and 4.5 to 5.0.
I assume this means my shapes are "different". Does this mean I can't use MWU? If not, can you make suggestions as to what I can use instead (SPSS)?
EDIT2: Sample data:
"Yes": 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4
"No": 4 5 5 5 3 2 4 3 4 4 4 4
I was using MWU to detect any significant differences (apparently, "yes") – but now am not sure if that's the right way to do it.
Best Answer
Here is an analysis using the R
Hmisc
andrms
packages.The likelihood ratio $\chi^{2}_{1}$ test for comparing the two groups yields $P=0.0323$
I obtained an exact $P$-value from the
exactRanktests
packagewilcox.exact
function of 0.04904.