Solved – What are the relative merits of Winsorizing vs. Trimming data

meantrimmed-meantruncationtypes-of-averageswinsorizing

Winsorizing data means to replace the extreme values of a data set with a certain percentile value from each end, while Trimming or Truncating involves removing those extreme values.

I always see both methods discussed as a viable option to lessen the effect of outliers when computing statistics such as the mean or standard deviation, but I have not seen why one might pick one over the other.

Are there any relative advantages or disadvantages to using Winsorizing or Trimming? Are there certain situations where one method would be preferable? Is one used more often in practice or are they basically interchangeable?

Best Answer

In a different, but related question on trimming that I just stumbled across, one answer had the following helpful insight into why one might use either winsorizing or trimming:

If you take the trimmed distribution, you explicitly state: I am not interested in outliers/ the tails of the distribution. If you believe that the "outliers" are really outliers (i.e., they do not belong to the distribution, but are of "another kind") then do trimming. If you think they belong to the distribution, but you want to have a less skewed distribution, you could think about winsorising.

I'm curious if there is a more definitive approach, but the above logic sounds reasonable.

Related Question