Solved – Interpreting the results of the Cronbach alpha test

cronbachs-alphareliabilitysurvey

I have a survey which contains 13 variables in total. For each variable I asked 3 similar questions in order to test the internal consistency.

Now I performed 13 Cronbach's alpha tests, one for each variable, to see whether people filled in the 3 questions per variable on a consistent basis. The results are presented below:

Variables ______________ Cronbachs Alpha ______ Cronbachs alpha if item deleted
Accessibility__________________0.416_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Accuracy
____________________0.680_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Completeness
________________0.681_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Consistency
__________________0.604_________________________0.718
Information Quality
_____________0.832_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Quantity
_____________________0.566_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Relevance
___________________0.327_________________________0.490
Reliability
____________________0.617_________________________0.689
Satisfaction
__________________0.747_________________________0.752
Timeliness
___________________0.398_________________________0.487
Understandability
______________0.569_______________Not possible to get a higher CA
Use
_________________________0.530________________________0.556
Usefulness
___________________0.655________________________0.721

My questions are the following:
If possible, do I need to delete an item in order to get a higher CA? Or should I only do this when the increase in CA is relatively high?
Can I use all the variable displayed above or are some of them worthless because of the low CA score?

Best Answer

What is your real goal/question to be answered? If your only goal is to get high values of CA then you can just generate random noise and replicate it a couple of times, nice high alpha value, but otherwise useless.

In my experiance Cronback's alpha is usually not the end goal and sometimes more of a distraction than a help. It could very well be that the most interesting part of the whole dataset is a variable that acts to pull down an alpha value (why is it not measuring what you thought it would?) and deleting that variable to get a high alpha would be the opposite of the best strategy.

So focus first on what you are trying to accomplish with this study (if high CA is really what is important then you need to go back and redesign the survey and possibly other data collection processes and collect new data), but it could also be that the CA values are only an interesting footnote to much more interesting results.