[Tex/LaTex] Why is the prime symbol too low? And: Why are the subscripts not scaled accordingly when I use \scriptsize

fontsizemath-modepositioningsubscripts

I have two (maybe simple) questions concerning the following LaTeX document

\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage[ansinew]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}                                
\usepackage{tikz}                                               
\usepackage{pgfplots}                                       
\usetikzlibrary{intersections, calc}

\makeatletter
\DeclareMathSizes{\@xipt}{\@xipt}{6}{5}
\makeatother

\begin{document}
This is a nice picture with $\underline{U}_\mathrm{N}$, $U_\mathrm{L}$, $\varphi_\mathrm{U}$ and $\varphi_\mathrm{L}.$  

\begin{tikzpicture}
    \def\angle{acos(0.95)}

    \draw[->, name path=ul] (0,0) --  (5,0) coordinate (A) node[near end, anchor=north] {$U_\mathrm{L}$};
    \draw[->, name path=ux] (A) -- +({90-\angle}:3) coordinate (B) node[midway, anchor=west] {$\mathrm{j} \, X_\mathrm{N} \, \underline{I}$};
    \draw[->, name path=un] (0,0) -- (B) node[near end, anchor=south east] {$\underline{U}_\mathrm{N}$};
    \draw[->, name path=i] (0,0) -- +({-\angle}:1.5) coordinate (C) node[near end, anchor=north east] {$\underline{I}$};

    \path (0,0) let \p1 = ($(B)$) in +(15:{veclen(\x1,\y1)}) coordinate (D);
    \draw[gray, dashed, name path=circ] let \p1 = ($(B)$) in (D) arc (15:50:{veclen(\x1,\y1)});

    \draw[->, gray, name path=ii] (C) -- +({-\angle}:0.5) coordinate (CC) node[anchor=north east] {$\underline{I}'$};
    \draw[->, gray, name path=uull] (0,0) -- (4,0) coordinate (AA) node[near end, anchor=south] {$U'_\mathrm{L}$};
    \path[name path=uuxx] (AA) -- +({90-\angle}:8);
    \draw[->, gray, name intersections={of=uuxx and circ}] (AA) -- (intersection-1) coordinate (BB);
    \draw[->, gray, name path=uunn] (0,0) -- (BB) node[near end, anchor=south east] {$\underline{U}'_\mathrm{N}$};

    \draw[->] (1,0) let \p1 = ($(B)$) in arc (0:{atan(\y1/\x1)}:1) node[midway, anchor=west] {\scriptsize{$\varphi_\mathrm{U}$}};
    \draw[->] (1,0) let \p1 = ($(C)$) in arc (0:{atan(\y1/\x1)}:1) node[near end, anchor=west] {\scriptsize{$-\varphi_\mathrm{L}$}};
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}}

which yields something like the following:

MWE

  1. Why is the prime symbol of $U'_\mathrm{L}$ in the tikzpicture lower than it is for the $\underline{U}'_\mathrm{N}$? (The latter prime positioning seems correct to me…) Obviously, this must have something to do with the \underline command – but what can I do to solve the problem of this prime symbol misplacement? Raising the prime symbol by writing $U^{'}_\mathrm{L}$ lifts it too high – and is most probably not the optimal way of solving this problem anyway.
  2. I used \DeclareMathSizes{\@xipt}{\@xipt}{6}{5} to reduce the size of subscripts and subsubscripts in math mode. However, this seems not to work when I use \scriptsize{} in the math environment as one can see from the angle label: The U and the L in the angle labels are appreciably bigger than they are in the text line above the diagram. I guess that this is because of my "static" setting in \DeclareMathSizes{\@xipt}{\@xipt}{6}{5} where I set the sizes to the fixed values of 6 and 5? If so, how can I reduce the size of subscripts and subsubscripts in math mode in a more flexible way? Writing \DeclareMathSizes{\@xipt}{\@xipt}{0.8*\@xipt}{0.7*\@xipt} didn't work…

Best Answer

The prime symbols are not too low, they're too small: you're requesting that first level sub/superscripts are 6pt, which is too small next to an 11pt size symbol.

Computing 80% of 11pt gives 8.8pt, and the standard first level sub/superscript size for 11pt is 8pt. Of course you need arbitrarily scalable fonts for this to work (\usepackage{lmodern}, for instance); just do the math:

\DeclareMathSizes{\@xipt}{\@xipt}{8.8}{7.7}

(but these values are too big, in my opinion and I'd leave the default). The font size used for subscripts is the same as the size used for superscripts and this can't be avoided. You can force big subscripts (typically uppercase letters) to be pushed a bit down by specifying a dummy superscript: compare

$a_{X} a^{}_{X}$

enter image description here

Related Question