I'm preparing a manuscript using Elsevier provided latex template.
I want to have final view like this published paper, as article info is present besides abstract
Using below elsevier provided template's latex code
\documentclass[times,referee,twocolumn,final,authoryear]{elsarticle}
\usepackage{ycviu}
\usepackage{framed,multirow}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\definecolor{newcolor}{rgb}{.8,.349,.1}
\journal{Computer Vision and Image Understanding}
\begin{document}
\ifpreprint
\setcounter{page}{1}
\else
\setcounter{page}{1}
\fi
\begin{frontmatter}
\title{Type the title of your paper, only capitalize first
word and proper nouns}
\author[1]{Fname \snm{Sname}}
\received{1 May 2013}
\finalform{10 May 2013}
\accepted{13 May 2013}
\availableonline{15 May 2013}
\communicated{S. Sarkar}
\begin{abstract}
Type your abstract here....
\end{abstract}
\begin{keyword}
\MSC 41A05\sep 41A10\sep 65D05\sep 65D17
\KWD Keyword1\sep Keyword2\sep Keyword3
%% MSC codes here, in the form: \MSC code \sep code
%% or \MSC[2008] code \sep code (2000 is the default)
\end{keyword}
\end{frontmatter}
I'm getting below view
Here keywords are not visible in its output pdf file. I tried already provided solutions on this website i.e. put keywords , keywords not showing and keywords but no one is working as required.
Best Answer
The template asks you to use the journal style by doing
\usepackage{ycviu}
.In this package I find the definition of the
keyword
environment asThe environment typesets its contents and saves the result in the box named
\keybox
. The only other place where\keybox
appears is in the definition of\articleinfobox
However,
\articleinfobox
appears nowhere else.This just means that the copy editors of the journal have a different version of
ycviu
they use for the final version.What you're provided with is a version of the package that's suitable for submissions to the journal and to produce the copy for the referees. Just don't worry. You can't replicate the final product yourself and I see good reasons for this: you won't be able to emulate the final form of the article pretending it has been published.