[Tex/LaTex] Tikz Flowchart nodes needed refinement

diagramstikz-pgf

I made the following diagram in Tikz. MWE is given below and it needs some refinement for nodes where they split into two arrows. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes,arrows}

\begin{document}


% Define block styles

\tikzstyle{block} = 
    [
        rectangle
      %, draw
     % , fill=blue!20
      , text width=5.0em
      , text centered
      , node distance=2.5cm
      , rounded corners
      , minimum height=1em
      ]

\tikzstyle{line} = 
    [
        draw
     , -latex'
     ]



\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance = 2cm, auto]


  % Place nodes
    \node [block] (Econo) {Econometrics};
    \node [block, below left of=Econo, node distance=2cm, xshift=-1.0cm] (Theoretical) {Theoretical};
    \node [block, below right of=Econo, node distance=2cm, xshift=1.0cm] (Applied) {Applied};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Econo.south), \p2=(Theoretical.north) in (Econo.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (Theoretical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Econo.south), \p2=(Applied.north) in (Econo.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (Applied.north);

  % Place nodes     
    \node [block, below left of=Theoretical, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=0.75cm] (TheoreticalClassical) {Classical};
    \node [block, below right of=Theoretical, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=-0.75cm] (TheoreticalBayesian) {Bayesian};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Theoretical.south), \p2=(TheoreticalClassical.north) in (Theoretical.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (TheoreticalClassical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Theoretical.south), \p2=(TheoreticalBayesian.north) in (Theoretical.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (TheoreticalBayesian.north);


  % Place nodes     
    \node [block, below left of=Applied, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=0.75cm] (AppliedClassical) {Classical};
    \node [block, below right of=Applied, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=-0.75cm] (AppliedBayesian) {Bayesian};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Applied.south), \p2=(AppliedClassical.north) in (Applied.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (AppliedClassical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Applied.south), \p2=(AppliedBayesian.north) in (Applied.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (AppliedBayesian.north);

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

Best Answer

Load positioning library and change all of = to = of in the node specifications. Your problems will be solved. Always use this library for positioning as this is more accurate. Also, it is better to use tikzset instead of obsolete tikzstyle as I did.

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes,arrows,positioning}

\begin{document}


% Define block styles

\tikzset{block/.style =
    {
        rectangle
      %, draw
     % , fill=blue!20
      , text width=5.0em
      , text centered
      , node distance=2.5cm
      , rounded corners
      , minimum height=1em
      },
line/.style =
    {
        draw
     , -latex'
     }
}



\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance = 2cm, auto]


  % Place nodes
    \node [block] (Econo) {Econometrics};
    \node [block, below left = of Econo, node distance=2cm, xshift=-1.0cm] (Theoretical) {Theoretical};
    \node [block, below right = of Econo, node distance=2cm, xshift=1.0cm] (Applied) {Applied};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Econo.south), \p2=(Theoretical.north) in (Econo.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (Theoretical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Econo.south), \p2=(Applied.north) in (Econo.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (Applied.north);

  % Place nodes
    \node [block, below left = of Theoretical, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=0.75cm] (TheoreticalClassical) {Classical};
    \node [block, below right = of Theoretical, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=-0.75cm] (TheoreticalBayesian) {Bayesian};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Theoretical.south), \p2=(TheoreticalClassical.north) in (Theoretical.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (TheoreticalClassical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Theoretical.south), \p2=(TheoreticalBayesian.north) in (Theoretical.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (TheoreticalBayesian.north);


  % Place nodes
    \node [block, below left = of Applied, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=0.75cm] (AppliedClassical) {Classical};
    \node [block, below right = of Applied, node distance=2.5cm, xshift=-0.75cm] (AppliedBayesian) {Bayesian};

  % Draw edges
    \path[line] let \p1=(Applied.south), \p2=(AppliedClassical.north) in (Applied.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (AppliedClassical.north);
    \path[line] let \p1=(Applied.south), \p2=(AppliedBayesian.north) in (Applied.south) -- +(0,0.5*\y2-0.5*\y1) -| (AppliedBayesian.north);

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] How to define the default vertical distance between nodes

I don't really get the question so I hope this is what you wanted. If you include a full document (such that we copy paste and see the problem on our systems) things are much more easier.

Here, you can change the default setting within a scope but your block style had a node distance which was resetting every time it is issued. I've made it 2mm such that we can see the difference easier.

\documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes.geometric,positioning}

\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[decision/.style={diamond, draw, text width=4.5em, text badly centered, node distance=3.5cm, inner sep=0pt},
                    block/.style   ={rectangle, draw, text width=6em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=4em, minimum height=2em},
                    cloud/.style   ={draw, ellipse, minimum height=2em},
                    line/.style    ={draw,-latex'},
                    node distance = 1cm, 
                    auto]
    \node [block] (1st) {1st};
    \node [block, right= of 1st]  (2nd1) {2nd1};
\begin{scope}[node distance=2mm and 10mm]%Here we change it for everything inside this scope
    \node [block, above= of 2nd1] (2nd2) {2nd2};
    \node [block, below= of 2nd1] (2nd3) {2nd3};
    \node [block, right= of 2nd1] (3rd1) {3rd1};
    \node [block, above= of 3rd1] (3rd2) {3rd2};
    \node [block, above= of 3rd2] (3rd3) {3rd3};
\end{scope}
    \node [block, below= of 3rd1] (3rd4) {3rd4};
    \node [block, below= of 3rd4] (3rd5) {3rd5};

    \path [line] (1st) -- (2nd1);
    \path [line] (2nd1) -- (2nd2);
    \path [line] (2nd1) -- (2nd3);
    \path [line] (2nd2) -- (3rd3);
    \path [line] (2nd1) -- (3rd1);
    \path [line] (1st) -- (2nd1);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

enter image description here

[Tex/LaTex] TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersection

A solution which allows to draw intersection segments of any two intersections is available as tikz library fillbetween.

This library works as general purpose tikz library, but it is shipped with pgfplots and you need to load pgfplots in order to make it work:

\documentclass{standalone}

\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usetikzlibrary{fillbetween}

\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}

\draw [name path=red,red] (120:1.06) circle (1.9);
%\draw [name path=yellow,yellow] (0:1.06) circle (2.12);
\draw [name path=green,green!50!black] (0:0.77) circle (2.41);
\draw [name path=blue,blue] (0:0) circle (1.06);

% substitute this temp path by `\path` to make it invisible:
\draw[name path=temp1, intersection segments={of=red and blue,sequence=L1}];
\draw[red,-stealth,ultra thick, intersection segments={of=temp1 and green,sequence=L3}];

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

enter image description here

The key intersection segments is described in all detail in the pgfplots reference manual section "5.6.6 Intersection Segment Recombination"; the key idea in this case is to

create a temporary path temp1 which is the first intersection segment of red and blue, more precisely, it is the first intersection segment in the Left argument in red and blue : red. This path is drawn as thin black path. Substitute its \draw statement by \path to make it invisible.
Compute the desired intersection segment by intersecting temp1 and green and use the correct intersection segment. By trial and error I figured that it is the third segment of path temp1 which is written as L3 (L = left argument in temp1 and green and 3 means third segment of that path).

The argument involves some trial and error because fillbetween is unaware of the fact that end and startpoint are connected -- and we as end users do not see start and end point.

Note that you can connect these path segments with other paths. If such an intersection segment should be the continuation of another path, use -- as before the first argument in sequence. This allows to fill paths segments:

\documentclass{standalone}

\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usetikzlibrary{fillbetween}

\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}

\draw [name path=red,red] (120:1.06) circle (1.9);
%\draw [name path=yellow,yellow] (0:1.06) circle (2.12);
\draw [name path=green,green!50!black] (0:0.77) circle (2.41);
\draw [name path=blue,blue] (0:0) circle (1.06);

% substitute this temp path by `\path` to make it invisible:
\draw[name path=temp1, intersection segments={of=red and blue,sequence=L1}];
\draw[red,fill=blue,-stealth,ultra thick, intersection segments={of=temp1 and green,sequence=L3}]  
    [intersection segments={of=temp1 and green, sequence={--R2}}]
;

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

enter image description here

Best Answer

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] How to define the default vertical distance between nodes

[Tex/LaTex] TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersection

Related Question