[Tex/LaTex] the correct way to typeset higher order time derivatives in LaTeX

Question

I am typing a series that involves higher order time derivatives, and I have two main problems.

First, the subscript of the derived variable seems to move further away from it with the more characters on top, is there a way to fix that?

Second, what is the best way to typeset an nth order derivative without it being too big as in \overset{(n)}{V}, or too high as in \overset{{}^{(n)}}{V}?

Here is an example that shows all the mentioned problems:

\documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}

\usepackage{mathtools}
\begin{document}
 $\displaystyle
 \dot{V}_t = \dot{V}_{t-1} + \ddot{V}_{t-1} dt + \frac{\dddot{V}_{t-1}dt^2}{2} +
 \frac{\overset{(4)}{V}_{t-1}dt^3}{6} + \dots + \frac{\overset{{}^{(n+1)}}{V}_{t-1}dt^n}{n!}
 $
\end{document}

EDIT:

\overset{\text{\tiny $(n)$}}{V} works for reducing the size of the overset, but the subscript distance is still a problem

EDIT 2:

The subscript distance can be reduced by adding negative spaces as in \frac{\overset{{}^{(n+1)}}{V}_{\!\!\!t-1}dt^n}{n!}. I'm not sure if it's the cleanest way to do it, but it works

Answer 1

There's probably no single or unique "correct" way to typeset this expression, but

• using \scriptscriptstyle for the overset terms (4) and (n+1),

• using \mathclap to "smash" the width of the term (n+1), and

• inserting a thinspace, \,, in front of the dt terms

may be what you need:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools} % for \mathclap macro
\begin{document}
\[
 \dot{V}_t = \dot{V}_{t-1} + 
 \ddot{V}_{t-1} \,dt + 
 \frac{\dddot{V}_{t-1}\,dt^2}{2} +
 \frac{\overset{\scriptscriptstyle(4)}{V}_{t-1}\,dt^3}{6} + \dots + 
 \frac{\overset{\mathclap{\scriptscriptstyle(n+1)}}{V}_{t-1}\,dt^n}{n!}
\]
\end{document}